hafen needs fires that spread like DS
burn the bugabusing cockroach den shithole
-
DonCheadle
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 6:24 am
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
DonCheadle wrote:People have always been obsessed by celebrities. There are just more outlets and opportunities to make a living exploiting that obsession nowadays.
-
Mr_Bober
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:51 pm
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
Which would these 3 easily fixable problems be?SnuggleSnail wrote:Stopping people from doing stuff they might want to do for non-siege reasons because of warflags seems big gay.
Daily reminder that the claim shield system had like 3 easily fixable problems, whereas every other system has had like 12 unfixable problems
-
azrid
- Posts: 3647
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:33 pm
-
Massa
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 4:58 am
- Location: the hams
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
so just for the record:
they can win sieges by spamming shit but when the offense does it it gets deleted?
they can win sieges by spamming shit but when the offense does it it gets deleted?


ass blast USA
-
MightySheep
- Posts: 2536
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:18 pm
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
I agree but I think everyone involved, attacker, defender, spectator, your mom, etc- can all agree that this siege system is probably the worst conceivable way of doing siege in any game everazrid wrote:going after the biggest village should be hard
A literal never ending battle of 1 side building walls with alts and the other side bashing them? After god knows how many siedge rework how is this where we landed? Is this really better than the "shield" mechanic of w10? Not that I ever understood or interacted with that system but it seems like most ppl remember it more fondly than whatever this current thing is
-
Cajoes
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:04 am
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
People remember the pre-curio system fondly too. Does not mean it was good.
-
Massa
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 4:58 am
- Location: the hams
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
not really equivalent love, and no one doesCajoes wrote:People remember the pre-curio system fondly too. Does not mean it was good.
however, i do fondly remember the many bug raids of yore.


ass blast USA
-
azrid
- Posts: 3647
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:33 pm
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
I would say its more balanced than ever.MightySheep wrote:I agree but I think everyone involved, attacker, defender, spectator, your mom, etc- can all agree that this siege system is probably the worst conceivable way of doing siege in any game everazrid wrote:going after the biggest village should be hard
A literal never ending battle of 1 side building walls with alts and the other side bashing them? After god knows how many siedge rework how is this where we landed? Is this really better than the "shield" mechanic of w10? Not that I ever understood or interacted with that system but it seems like most ppl remember it more fondly than whatever this current thing is
It all came down to who had more willpower.
Should you have a guarantee to wipe the biggest village off the map as soon as you break in? I don't think so.
I have always supported non lethal sieges.
The positive outcome of this situation is that all the pvp chads can go back to having pvp near whateverbay. At least the ones that didn't quit haven
You can wipe normie villages no problem but big community projects should be hard to destroy like they are now.
Anyone feel free to present a better system in a C&I thread I'll give you my honest rating.
Enjoy Albion, its way better in terms of pvp content.


-
Halbertz
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
It is a habitat of sprucecaps, building alts, mystery and gayest gays ever that have their map not loaded outside 20 tiles from safepali.azrid wrote: go back to having pvp near whateverbay
-
overtyped
- Posts: 3906
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
- Location: Quaran book burning festival
Re: Spamming cornerposts to prevent/delay siege
Idk, tbh I had fun building walls with all the boys.MightySheep wrote:I agree but I think everyone involved, attacker, defender, spectator, your mom, etc- can all agree that this siege system is probably the worst conceivable way of doing siege in any game everazrid wrote:going after the biggest village should be hard
A literal never ending battle of 1 side building walls with alts and the other side bashing them? After god knows how many siedge rework how is this where we landed? Is this really better than the "shield" mechanic of w10? Not that I ever understood or interacted with that system but it seems like most ppl remember it more fondly than whatever this current thing is
However, as another poster mentioned, sieging is a battle of wills. Your will to win was less than our will to win, therefore, you lost.
Breaking walls is also easier than making them, especially at high strength. We have to gather the wood, chop it into blocks, cart it over, and then make the cornerpost. Meanwhile, all you have to do is spend a minute bashing it. You had the advantage here, yet you guys are still complaining? We put in more time defending, so you can't blame the system.
Your leader, Snugglesnail, had every chance to keep the place open for as long as he wanted, but one of his grunts, probably you, dropped the ball and let the walls fully soak.
Last edited by overtyped on Mon Dec 18, 2023 5:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
Early world exploit: Put your hearthfire inside a cave, then hold shift to position a claim right in front of a cave. After 8 hours the claim will be unbreakable. Since your hearthfire is inside the cave, you can still get back inside, and leave, but nobody will be able to enter, effectively making you unraidable for the first 3-7 days. Enjoy