Reforming IRC Moderation

General discussion and socializing.
GrandProjectMK2
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:56 pm

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by GrandProjectMK2 »

I vote for.....DARKI :D
Dusk
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by Dusk »

Sarchi wrote:It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to have people from different places (and not just goons) moderate the channel so that some moron couldn't just say that it's biased or whatever.
The IRC channel is run by goons, it is biased towards their opinions. While I fully support other mods I don't think it would matter much. Goons own the channel, people just need to deal with it.

I know the goal is to make this the "official" irc channel for H&H. But it will continue to be a goon playhouse unless you make structural changes, like a real set of rules that are enforced.

+1 DoG
Last edited by Dusk on Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thurrok
Posts: 569
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:01 pm

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by Thurrok »

+1 for DoG and ofcourse +100 for Darki. The former serious, the latter just to blend in with the crowd 8-)
(Darki, I can't believe it was me who started your mod election campaign. You owe me a beer.)
Menschen sind Scheiße. Überall.

HAIL CATFACE!
User avatar
Britannia
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:18 am
Location: collage exchange student, USA

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by Britannia »

Dusk wrote:
Sarchi wrote:It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to have people from different places (and not just goons) moderate the channel so that some moron couldn't just say that it's biased or whatever.
The IRC channel is run by goons, it is biased towards their opinions. While I fully support other mods I don't think it would matter much. Goons own the channel, people just need to deal with it.

I know the goal is to make this the "official" irc channel for H&H. But it will continue to be a goon playhouse unless you make structural changes, like a real set of rules that are enforced.

+1 DoG
Why not just create a different IRC channel as the official one?
~Zegrande Armie~

Image
Kills: 103 Deaths: 0
User avatar
ElGato
Posts: 1945
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:10 am

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by ElGato »

Britannia wrote:
Why not just create a different IRC channel as the official one?
Noone's stopping you!
burgingham wrote:We are all Gato, and Gato is Delamore of course. Goons blablabla...
Caradon wrote:Gato, the anti-ghandi
Sabinati wrote:yeah we're gonna kill you gato!!!
User avatar
Britannia
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:18 am
Location: collage exchange student, USA

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by Britannia »

:D

No spicks allowed though.
~Zegrande Armie~

Image
Kills: 103 Deaths: 0
User avatar
DatOneGuy
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by DatOneGuy »

You can try all you want but why bother?

1)It would be the same exact problem if someone else ran it,people screaming bias, and bias then actually happening.

2)Jorb/Loftar don't seem to want an 'Official' one which would be the only reason to actually change it.

No one's stopping you from doing it, I had #haven on Rizon for quite some time but only used it 4chan villagers/players.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dusk
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by Dusk »

DatOneGuy wrote:You can try all you want but why bother?

1)It would be the same exact problem if someone else ran it,people screaming bias, and bias then actually happening.

2)Jorb/Loftar don't seem to want an 'Official' one which would be the only reason to actually change it.
These are my thoughts as well. One way to reduce the amount of people screaming bias is to enforce a serious set of rules. Right now the rules boil down to, annoy a mod, get banned. Adding more mods or removing current ones isn't going to fix this problem.
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by sabinati »

aside from the obvious spamming or posting goatman or whatever, what rules should there be?
User avatar
DatOneGuy
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Reforming IRC Moderation

Post by DatOneGuy »

No spamming.

A strict rule of either there's no Racism bullshit OR there's no rule for it.

I often see people go on for hours about how people are 'niggers' or 'fucking chinks and slanted eyes' blah blah blah without a goddamn thing happening then 2 hours later someone halfass mentions something racist and gets a ban, it's happened more times than I care to count, there should either be a rule that this isn't allowed or a rule that it is, otherwise people see it happen, think it's okay, do it, and then get banned for it.

Posting links to stuff, I know this is already enforced, it should be stated as an obvious rule, posting to obscene shit should be a ban, I almost vomitted while eating once when that dude you banned after posted some gore.

Getting around bans and impersonating people should be optional.


--
These are just some typical rules you see in most IRC channels, really it should just be whatever the leaders of IRC see 'fit' as rules, but they should be stuck to, since there are 'no rules', people do things and wonder why they get banned later.

As for the 'disagreeing/arguing/talking back to a mod = ban' that's absolute bullshit imo, the IRC while 'unofficial' is essentially a 'public forum' for most people and we talk freely in there, if a mod kills you and you start calling them a faggot for it, why is that any different than if some random user killed you and you start calling them a faggot?

Just some ideas.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Return to “The Inn of Brodgar”