Who needs World 4?

General discussion and socializing.
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Potjeh »

And I want to go full UA next map. Them manoeuvres make combat more fun. Shame UA doesn't get anything like thanes, though.
Image Bottleneck
DeadlyPencil
Posts: 924
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by DeadlyPencil »

Potjeh wrote:And I want to go full UA next map. Them manoeuvres make combat more fun. Shame UA doesn't get anything like thanes, though.
i thought U/A would be super good too until i learned how the maneuvers were calculated. when u start getting really high stats, that +25% for shields really starts to add up. same with the 1.75 from the val. strike.
User avatar
Jackard
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Jackard »

joojoo1975 wrote:a lot of peeps know that the vets from world 2 kept thier char's into world 3
Image
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Potjeh »

Yeah, but on the other hand you get to shoot people in the face with a ranger bow, and they'll take heavy damage regardless of their defence.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Avu
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Avu »

Well you kinda need both. Fighting against someone with no unarmed is like christmas.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Potjeh »

Yeah, melee needs UA, but UA doesn't need melee.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Phizuol
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:26 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Phizuol »

I'm assuming he means Marksman needs UA
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Potjeh »

No, melee needs some UA too, or manoeuvres will rape you.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Phizuol
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:26 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Phizuol »

Ah, right. Thinking on a higher strategy level than me. =<
User avatar
Neptjunoue
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:20 am

Re: Who needs World 4?

Post by Neptjunoue »

Potjeh wrote:And I want to go full UA next map. Them manoeuvres make combat more fun. Shame UA doesn't get anything like thanes, though.
I think if they had something like that for UA, too many people will go UA. UA is without its weakness though as they have the mentioned lack of boosters that are practical like thanes. Also the hunting speed for UA is slower as they take longer to kill animals, notably bears. This can be remedied with alternative LP gaining methods, or putting MM for ranger bow.

Anyhow a new world gives a chance of a new lifestyle and game style as well. Wayneville of 2nd world was the major power and it was an aggressive one as well. Then many of the people in WV called to people from various groups such as CoP and decided to start another major power with a style that is kind of a trader version of the Brotherhood of Steel from Falllout (does that make AD the Enclave?).
Reaper, Reaper, that's what people call me! Why?
Cause they all die! When I sing, I end their lives
You act as though payback makes you a noble man
Is that a fact? Well, you're a goddamn Philistine!

Return to “The Inn of Brodgar”