jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad.
too bad
It would suck even if we could enforce it. Why should people be allowed to play only one character? Really?
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."
jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad.
too bad
It would suck even if we could enforce it. Why should people be allowed to play only one character? Really?
I'm not suggesting it, just like the OP isn't suggesting permadeath. I'm just saying, how would it work in theory, and in a perfect world where it was 100% enforcable.
aso11 wrote:
NaoWhut wrote:Our grasslands will block out the sun.
Wait... grassland doesn't fly. Dude, you've been playing too much Minecraft.
It never ceases to amaze me how people continually persist in suggesting that police state behaviors are a good thing. Fucking brainwashed fascists. At the pinnacle of evolution there are always those who live in fear and promote stagnation with superstitious stories of bygone and discarded eras.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
Chakravanti wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how people continually persist in suggesting that police state behaviors are a good thing. Fucking brainwashed fascists. At the pinnacle of evolution there are always those who live in fear and promote stagnation with superstitious stories of bygone and discarded eras.
Chill out Chak, out of weed again? It's possible to discuss what effect a one character per person limit would have on the game without endorsing such a limit.
Once a man has changed the relationship between himself and his environment, he cannot return to the blissful ignorance he left. Motion, of necessity, involves a change in perspective.
-Commissioner Pravin Lal, "A Social History of Planet"
Actually, 1 char per account is actually a good idea. It would keep the people who disrupt the trade fluency by being independent at bay, at least to some point. Until they find out you can make multiple accounts, haha
Jotun wrote:Actually, 1 char per account is actually a good idea. It would keep the people who disrupt the trade fluency by being independent at bay, at least to some point. Until they find out you can make multiple accounts, haha
Who would give a shit? Nothing but more passwords to remember, just add a fucking digit to the end of your account name and wala.