Perma-death

General discussion and socializing.
User avatar
Sotsa
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:07 am

Re: Perma-death

Post by Sotsa »

jorb wrote:
Sotsa wrote:
jorb wrote:A no-alt policy would be unenforceable.
It would, however be quite rad. :(
too bad
It would suck even if we could enforce it. Why should people be allowed to play only one character? Really?
it would make keys work as intended.
i am not saying, however that you should try.
i know it's impossible/too much fucking work and enforcing it is stupid.
Before you take insult to this post, keep in mind that I am simply a warrior of truth.
User avatar
Wolfang
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:26 pm

Re: Perma-death

Post by Wolfang »

People wouldn't hide all their treasured keys & other stuff on alts for one.
sabinati wrote:But Wolfang, it's the mods who are trolls, remember. please have some mercy on this innocent victim of merciless trolling by the moderation team before you make any more ad hominem remarks about him.
Image
User avatar
DatOneGuy
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Perma-death

Post by DatOneGuy »

Sotsa wrote: i know it's impossible
/Thread
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
User avatar
Onionfighter
Posts: 2957
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:45 am
Location: Mordor

Re: Perma-death

Post by Onionfighter »

Wolfang wrote:People wouldn't hide all their treasured keys & other stuff on alts for one.
If hearthfires could be stolen from, this would be pointless.
Cheerleader
User avatar
Sotsa
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:07 am

Re: Perma-death

Post by Sotsa »

Onionfighter wrote:
Wolfang wrote:People wouldn't hide all their treasured keys & other stuff on alts for one.
If hearthfires could be stolen from, this would be pointless.
Oh shit. i want this.
Before you take insult to this post, keep in mind that I am simply a warrior of truth.
User avatar
Sarchi
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:14 am
Location: 109, -37

Re: Perma-death

Post by Sarchi »

Especially if you could have a chance of burning yourself and causing enormous HHP loss. ;)
User avatar
DatOneGuy
Posts: 5553
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
Location: I'm in Miami, trick.

Re: Perma-death

Post by DatOneGuy »

Sarchi wrote:Especially if you could have a chance of burning yourself and causing enormous HHP loss. ;)
Big letters gotta write out outrageous disses like "YOU GOT BURNED!!!" and it needs some groovy audio to go with it while you lose 75% HHP.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
User avatar
kLauE
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: Perma-death

Post by kLauE »

hnh without perm-death would sucks.
to lazy to write a novel now, u should get it by ur own.
Monkeytofu
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:41 am
Yahoo Messenger: tpilolbuggy
Location: Texas

Re: Perma-death

Post by Monkeytofu »

If somehow alts were banned, you'd see more village activity, but not much. Considering the fact that no one is forced to specialize when increasing stats and pretty much everyone can be a "jack of all trades" and have access to most materials without any other person's help, banning alts wouldn't do much other than prevent "mining alts" and extra storage room.

If specialization was a part of the game, resources were scarce (types of crops and resources other than mines), and alts were banned, I'd bet you'd see a definite rise in active villages that actually function as villages rather than glorified tree houses for you and your friends. People would value their characters a lot more since there would be no option of using another character you had set aside.

I also believe that forcing people to one character an account would be an effective way to stopping a large amount of alts(if you wanted to do so ;) ), as I assume in general people (always an exception, I know) don't want to go through the effort (although minimal) of making an account, logging in each time you use it, etc. But
[13:09:52] <shadowchris> u seduce to name calling?
Flame wrote: Do you want show me another proof of you're QI with another nonsense post or you'll choose to stay silent if you don't have nothing of value to say?

Return to “The Inn of Brodgar”