Which world do you feel was most exciting?

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Which world do you feel was most exciting?

World One
7
8%
World Two
35
40%
World Three
46
52%
 
Total votes: 88

User avatar
Gauteamus
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 7:16 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Gauteamus »

New poll:

Code: Select all

In which world did you start playing?
  If you started in World 1: Which world do you feel was most exiting?
    [ ] World 1
    [x] World 2
    [ ] World 3
  If you started in World 2: Which world do you feel was most exiting?
    [ ] World 1
    [ ] World 2
    [ ] World 3
  If you started in World 3: Which world do you feel was most exiting?
    [ ] World 1
    [ ] World 2
    [ ] World 3
Image<<Bottleneck>>
What if Rosa Parks had a car?
User avatar
NaoWhut
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by NaoWhut »

I loved world 1 and 2, the map was smaller
and it actually encouraged violence, world
one i really only got to watch and dream of
being a part of it, world 2 i finally got to
get into it and absolutely loved all the raids
i got to be in considering they were on people
who were online mostly and they would
sometimes fight back but the difference in
people's power back then wasn't too great.

World 1 was deffinitely pretty awesome.

World 3, sadly lacks violence among the larger
factions, most drama is kept local and everyone
randomly tracks every scent they see.
ImageImage
User avatar
kLauE
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by kLauE »

world 2 with the old combay system was the best.
would have voted for world 1, but i started to late and i played only 1 month on it and the server was sometimes very laggy with many crashes.
User avatar
Jackard
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Jackard »

Gauteamus wrote:*post another needlessly complex suggestion, its becoming a trend honestly*
you give their polling system way too much credit. also, no
User avatar
Gauteamus
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 7:16 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Gauteamus »

Hmm, it was not really a serious suggestion.
Also, the old combat system was plain stupid - do you even remember how it worked? I sure don't!
Image<<Bottleneck>>
What if Rosa Parks had a car?
User avatar
Jackard
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Jackard »

poll has 13 russians so far
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Potjeh »

Da.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by burgingham »

NaoWhut wrote:I loved world 1 and 2, the map was smaller
and it actually encouraged violence, world
one i really only got to watch and dream of
being a part of it, world 2 i finally got to
get into it and absolutely loved all the raids
i got to be in considering they were on people
who were online mostly and they would
sometimes fight back but the difference in
people's power back then wasn't too great.

World 1 was deffinitely pretty awesome.

World 3, sadly lacks violence among the larger
factions, most drama is kept local and everyone
randomly tracks every scent they see.
This and
kLauE wrote:world 2 with the old combay system was the best.
would have voted for world 1, but i started to late and i played only 1 month on it and the server was sometimes very laggy with many crashes.
this.
@gauteamus: I certainly prefer a fast and stupid combat system over one where I have to stand around and wait for 5 minutes before anything happens.
User avatar
Gauteamus
Posts: 858
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 7:16 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Gauteamus »

burgingham wrote: @gauteamus: I certainly prefer a fast and stupid combat system over one where I have to stand around and wait for 5 minutes before anything happens.
Are you talking about PvP or PvE primarily here?
I am not at all saying the current combat system is neither fun nor "brainy", but if you do not have 5 minutes to spare when the matter on the scales is 4 months of a person grinding, I feel you should do like me and go back to making beet art (I should add I hardly hunt, and as good as never engage in PvP).
In a permadeath game, combat should not be fast and stupid.

But yeah, the source of fun in world 2 came from its politics, and combat does not have to be intricate to allow game of thrones Diplomacy.
I do obviously not have a fast and stupid answer to how to bring back Dipomacy through mechanics.
It is part of what made world 1 so fun - so few actual mechanics to abide by, and so little world space to do it in :-)

Statement: I think the current combat system is better than the old one, but I do not have valid arguments to confirm my position.
Image<<Bottleneck>>
What if Rosa Parks had a car?
User avatar
Wolfang
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:26 pm

Re: Which world do you feel was most exciting?

Post by Wolfang »

Considering the population of World 3 vastly surpasses that of World 2...it's doing good.

Also considering the fact that many world 2-ers have stopped playing already.
sabinati wrote:But Wolfang, it's the mods who are trolls, remember. please have some mercy on this innocent victim of merciless trolling by the moderation team before you make any more ad hominem remarks about him.
Image

Return to “[ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled”