Faggots

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
User avatar
Caradon
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: Faggots

Post by Caradon »

great, so people want to burn fags.
Trolls- Dont argue with it, Don't reason with it, Just DOMINATE! Southpark S10-E5
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: Faggots

Post by sabinati »

faggots should only provide one piece of charcoal though
Colbear
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:51 pm

Re: Faggots

Post by Colbear »

sabinati wrote:faggots should only provide one piece of charcoal though
I think they should be two, because branches are one inventory space. Bundling them should make it take more space.
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: Faggots

Post by sabinati »

ok lets say you have 5 branches and some string, you make a bundle, it takes up 2 slots. that part i'm fine with. i just don't think that 5 sticks (an easily obtainable, unlimited resource) and a string (another easily obtainable resource that is not very limited) should yield the same amount of charcoal as a block of wood (a somewhat more difficult to obtain resource, that while renewable, is also somewhat difficult to renew)
Thursday
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Faggots

Post by Thursday »

I agree with the above post.

This is still a way to make charcoal, without deforestation.

However, since charcoal is so valuable (you can't make metal without it), the easy option should also be less efficient.

You get less charcoal this way, but preserve resources, it's give and take.
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: Faggots

Post by theTrav »

I disagree with allowing charcoal without deforestation. The whole industry vs nature contention would disappear and there's room for a lot of color around that struggle.

I also think that unlimited branches from a single tree is pretty unrealistic as well, however I can see how tracking things like that on each object could become quite an overhead.
User avatar
Peter
Posts: 1491
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:36 am

Re: Faggots

Post by Peter »

How about this: there's only a 50% chance that each fattie (That's what we call them around my place) produces a lump of coal?
Surprise.
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: Faggots

Post by theTrav »

Peter wrote:How about this: there's only a 50% chance that each fattie (That's what we call them around my place) produces a lump of coal?
Jorb and Loftar will no doubt work out such specifics themselves, but hopefully they don't implement anything like this until they've worked out a way to stop players from getting infinite branches off a single mulberry tree in the center of their metropolis.
User avatar
loftar
Posts: 9096
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
Location: Your character database

Re: Faggots

Post by loftar »

theTrav wrote:Jorb and Loftar will no doubt work out such specifics themselves, but hopefully they don't implement anything like this until they've worked out a way to stop players from getting infinite branches off a single mulberry tree in the center of their metropolis.
Actually, I have another idea altogether. But I'm not telling yet. :)
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: Faggots

Post by theTrav »

loftar wrote:Actually, I have another idea altogether. But I'm not telling yet. :)
Sounds ominous :P

Return to “Critique & Ideas”