You could increase the animal's max level.
This would go against what I think is currently planned, which is to remove animal levels altogether.
-
Onionfighter
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:45 am
- Location: Mordor
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
Cheerleader
-
Phizuol
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:26 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
Hmm, well if there's already something in the works then please lock this suggestion. =3Onionfighter wrote:You could increase the animal's max level.
This would go against what I think is currently planned, which is to remove animal levels altogether.
-
Onionfighter
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:45 am
- Location: Mordor
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
it would be the same as it is now. he just wants cutting to to be able to improve the q of meat.
i'd prefer the removal of animal levels and a backend eco-sim that allowed some region randomness and wild breeding that effects the types, quality, and quantity of animals spawned in those regions. and of course, overhunting and civ levels would effect the ecosystem.
i'd prefer the removal of animal levels and a backend eco-sim that allowed some region randomness and wild breeding that effects the types, quality, and quantity of animals spawned in those regions. and of course, overhunting and civ levels would effect the ecosystem.
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
so we all go back to making flour...sabinati wrote:it would be the same as it is now. he just wants cutting to to be able to improve the q of meat.
i'd prefer the removal of animal levels and a backend eco-sim that allowed some region randomness and wild breeding that effects the types, quality, and quantity of animals spawned in those regions. and of course, overhunting and civ levels would effect the ecosystem.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
there would still always be animals, and preferably more types, but overhunting the same region would decrease animal spawns. but just like resource spots, fish spots, etc. they would recover.
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
so you gotta keep moving? sound good enought, but then i THINK a similar limitation should be added to farming.sabinati wrote:there would still always be animals, and preferably more types, but overhunting the same region would decrease animal spawns. but just like resource spots, fish spots, etc. they would recover.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
-
Sotsa
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:07 am
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
naw man, that's stupid, moving a farm would be WAY more hassle than moving yourself.
+ it would be extremely silly.
+ it would be extremely silly.
Before you take insult to this post, keep in mind that I am simply a warrior of truth.
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Remove quality cap for wild animal products
i dont mean move the whole farm, prolly just mak it so after a certain amount of planted and harvested goods the soil will change so that the next seed would take more time or loose some qSotsa wrote:naw man, that's stupid, moving a farm would be WAY more hassle than moving yourself.
+ it would be extremely silly.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST