Waterskin buff

[lawton]

The waterflask is a more efficient water container than the skin, but requires less and easier to aqcuire material. Only taking 1 slot also makes it more versatile. The waterskin should be buffed to hold at least 5 l of water, making it more efficient but more expensive and less versatile.

[sabinati]

it is intentional that the easier to get item is not as good as the harder to get item. why on earth should it be otherwise?

[Lahrmid]

err, i think you read the OP wrong Sab.

Currently the waterflask beats the waterskin by far, having 2 waterflasks instead of skins gives you more water than a single skin.

Granted, you have to click twice more, but still, waterskin needs dis buff.

[lawton]

You read incorrectly, the easy to acquire item is better. I am glad you agree, 3rd poster.

[Nahp]

I've also noticed this and thought the same thing. The skin should be made 5 L

[sabinati]

uh, apparently i did miss something in the reading of the OP: a major fail of logic. since when is 1 leather easier to get than 1 dried hide?

[SacreDoom]

uh, apparently i did miss something in the reading of the OP: a major fail of logic. since when is 1 leather easier to get than 1 dried hide?

2nd that.

Also, The Number of The Beast.

[lawton]

Because rabbits are easier to get than boars.

[slipper]

Waterskin is easier to get, and the 3L capacity is enough for 2 full stamina bars with q10 water (less clicking than carrying two waterflasks).

[slipper]

Because rabbits are easier to get than boars.

You can use any dried skin to craft a waterskin.