POST CURIOSITY + DISCOVERY INFO HERE

[cobaltjones]

Can we nuke the "Curiosity" page from the wiki please? Or at least the chart that goes with it. So much incorrect and incomplete information there. At least the curiosity table pulls the information from the individual item pages.

[MagicManICT]

Can we nuke the "Curiosity" page from the wiki please? Or at least the chart that goes with it. So much incorrect and incomplete information there. At least the curiosity table pulls the information from the individual item pages.

There's a thread for discussing the wiki and the curio information and layout in the Inn. It might have fallen off the front page, though.

edit: Oh, and feel free to update or nuke any incorrect information. Be a nice wiki editor and leave comments about why you changed something.

[sabinati]

i moved the good table to curiosity page http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Curiosity

old table is here http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Stupid_ma ... sity_table

[cobaltjones]

Thank you sir!

[Barhandar]

Now instead with good manual curios table we have shitty automatic table that doesn't gives a shit about different columns for skills and items required. "Thanks", undoing that.

If anyone knows how to do HUGE BOLD RED TEXT in wiki, add it to both links to "Curiosity Table" page in "Curiosity" article, to prevent further complains about "bad manual table".

P.S. If you don't like info on manual table, EDIT IT. That's the point of the wiki.

[cobaltjones]

The manual table shouldn't exist. There's no reason for it. If you're that annoyed by a simple layout change in exchange for a heap of incorrect and unconfirmed information, then you've got bigger problems.

[sabinati]

Now instead with good manual curios table we have shitty automatic table that doesn't gives a shit about different columns for skills and items required. "Thanks", undoing that.

If anyone knows how to do HUGE BOLD RED TEXT in wiki, add it to both links to "Curiosity Table" page in "Curiosity" article, to prevent further complains about "bad manual table".

P.S. If you don't like info on manual table, EDIT IT. That's the point of the wiki.

YOU CUNT

the point of the auto table is that it takes info from the individual pages and doesn't need to be manually updated. and is thusly presenting the best currently known information. if you feel like the auto table is missing information, then add it in.

[Barhandar]

the point of the auto table is that it takes info from the individual pages and doesn't need to be manually updated. and is thusly presenting the best currently known information. if you feel like the auto table is missing information, then add it in.

AUTO TABLE IS ALREADY PRESENT ON WIKI DAMMIT, even with link from main page.

[cobaltjones]

the point of the auto table is that it takes info from the individual pages and doesn't need to be manually updated. and is thusly presenting the best currently known information. if you feel like the auto table is missing information, then add it in.

AUTO TABLE IS ALREADY PRESENT ON WIKI DAMMIT, even with link from main page.

The problem is that the manual table has no reason for existing. Fix the formatting of the auto table if it really bothers you that much, but there's no reason the wiki should contain two different sources of the "same" information. The curiosity table should pull all its values directly from the individual curiosity pages, so if there's an incorrect value then it only needs to be updated once.

Seriously, just look at the manual list. It's got so many incorrect values that it'd take a couple hours to fix in the first place.

[sabinati]

the point of the auto table is that it takes info from the individual pages and doesn't need to be manually updated. and is thusly presenting the best currently known information. if you feel like the auto table is missing information, then add it in.

AUTO TABLE IS ALREADY PRESENT ON WIKI DAMMIT, even with link from main page.

oh well then we should certainly never make any changes!