Dear forumites,
I just updated phpBB to 3.0.8. It appears to be working fine for now, but please tell me if you see anything wrong with it.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Administrivia: Updated phpBB
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Administrivia: Update phpBB
noooo my active topics!
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
Did something change with them?
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
there are only 17 topics listed and they are all from in congress assembled. see for yourself: search.php?search_id=active_topics
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
Indeed; how odd. Admittedly, though, I never understood what is meant by "active" topics. By what criterion are topics considered active? I always just use the "new posts" search.
Anyway, I'll check it out. I think the ACP had something related to those things.
Anyway, I'll check it out. I think the ACP had something related to those things.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
So there; better? :)
I find phpBB to be a weird piece of software. It has settings all over the place and sometimes those settings seem to alter themselves. I'm not entirely sure I like phpBB, truth be told. If you want something done properly, you have to do it yourself, I guess.
I find phpBB to be a weird piece of software. It has settings all over the place and sometimes those settings seem to alter themselves. I'm not entirely sure I like phpBB, truth be told. If you want something done properly, you have to do it yourself, I guess.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
i always click "view active topics" too, never thought of trying "new posts" till i saw this lol so im not sure what the difference is now.loftar wrote:Indeed; how odd. Admittedly, though, I never understood what is meant by "active" topics. By what criterion are topics considered active? I always just use the "new posts" search.
Anyway, I'll check it out. I think the ACP had something related to those things.
(last i clicked "view active topics" somehow i ended up in congress. is it fixed now?)
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
Should be, but please verify. :)Tonkyhonk wrote:(last i clicked "view active topics" somehow i ended up in congress. is it fixed now?)
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
yes, it looks fine now
ty!
(i still cant see the difference between "new posts" and "active topics" xD)
↓ahh thanks! good to know.
(i still cant see the difference between "new posts" and "active topics" xD)
↓ahh thanks! good to know.
Last edited by Tonkyhonk on Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
DatOneGuy
- Posts: 5553
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: I'm in Miami, trick.
Re: Administrivia: Updated phpBB
New posts shows posts you haven't seen yet afaik, if you click into a topic already and then refresh it shouldn't show up until a new post is up.Tonkyhonk wrote:yes, it looks fine nowty!
(i still cant see the difference between "new posts" and "active topics" xD)
--
Nice update.
Was going to suggest (maybe here is a good place) that we FINALLY get tags. Not having them is SO annoying.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .