-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
-
novaalpha
- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:42 pm
- Location: Sparta
Re: Walljump Raiders.
Can you provide screenshot from 4 sides? Only 1 side means nothing.
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.
doesnt look like an evidence of a bug raid, but just another tracking work to me.cauda_draconis wrote:Tonkyhonk wrote: any details to show, to be convincing enough? or just accusing?
(because you should know many people want to raid RUA, not just Pande lol)
and why you waited for a week to talk about it?
you still havent replied to why you had to wait for a week for this, either. no comments?
-
cauda_draconis
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: Walljump Raiders.
I'm not so nice warrior to run circles around Pande making skreenshoots.novaalpha wrote:Can you provide screenshot from 4 sides? Only 1 side means nothing.
I could give my word, that it's Pande. Or perhaps someone dig under Pande and leave his HF there, but i doubt it.
But if Pande will tell now: "no, this is fotoshop", i will try to make screens from 4 side.
-
cauda_draconis
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: Walljump Raiders.
What evidence will you appreciate? Should i make video of how i take scents near vault, swim to Pande and track that scents?Tonkyhonk wrote: doesnt look like an evidence of a bug raid, but just another tracking work to me.
you still havent replied to why you had to wait for a week for this, either. no comments?
If you do not want to believe that fact, you will tell me something else, say, that i draw that video by hand.
P.S. I approved the version of DatOneGuy above. Yes, we wanted to understand how the bug works to strike back. Yes, we failed.
Should i tell that 10 times more for you get more pleasure?
-
Headshot
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:04 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.

DoG, can you said something about your panda's friends-abusers?
W3 - Vitterstad | Headhunter [Lawspeaker]
W4 - AD/Sparta | VIII The Justice [Fighter]
W5 - Vitterstad | Headhunter [Founder]
H8 - Core | Headhunt [Founder]
H10 - Dis | Dominar Morghoul [Council]
H12 - Wild West Exodus | Headshot [Lawspeaker]
H13 - TPDR | Headshot [Member]
H14 - Definitely Not Abusers | Headhunter [Member]
H15 - Mental Disorder | Headshot [Member]
H16 - hidden
W4 - AD/Sparta | VIII The Justice [Fighter]
W5 - Vitterstad | Headhunter [Founder]
H8 - Core | Headhunt [Founder]
H10 - Dis | Dominar Morghoul [Council]
H12 - Wild West Exodus | Headshot [Lawspeaker]
H13 - TPDR | Headshot [Member]
H14 - Definitely Not Abusers | Headhunter [Member]
H15 - Mental Disorder | Headshot [Member]
H16 - hidden
-
Patchouli_Knowledge
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:57 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.
I'm afraid this discussion doesn't seems to be leading anywhere as both side already things the other side as guilty. Furthermore, RUA has picked up more nemesis from their raiding of late, some associated within their own ranks. There are far worse ways to be destroy other than raiding, bugs, and exploits.

-=The law of inverse desire=- The chances of dropping what you want is the reciprocal of how much you want it.
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.
right, i do not want to believe it. your group has deceived many enough not to be trusted anyways.cauda_draconis wrote:What evidence will you appreciate? Should i make video of how i take scents near vault, swim to Pande and track that scents?
If you do not want to believe that fact, you will tell me something else, say, that i draw that video by hand.
and to be completely honest, i want to see you all killed for all the crimes your group has done, but that is a different matter here.
you do not show how you are so sure about "a bug" you got raided with.
1) why are you so certain this is a bug raid?
2) why did you wait for so long to talk about it?
-
cauda_draconis
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: Walljump Raiders.
So i cant do anything to assure you, so this is not very meaningfull dialogue, isn't it?Tonkyhonk wrote: right, i do not want to believe it. your group has deceived many enough not to be trusted anyways.
Did you read "Game of Thrones"?Tonkyhonk wrote:and to be completely honest, i want to see you all killed for all the crimes your group has done, but that is a different matter here.
Cause guys were killed offline, and their brickwalls were untouched.1) why are you so certain this is a bug raid?
Look at update at my last post.2) why did you wait for so long to talk about it?
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Walljump Raiders.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=18841&start=20#p219159cauda_draconis wrote:Cause guys were killed offline, and their brickwalls were untouched.1) why are you so certain this is a bug raid?
see what seraphimos said in that thread previously?
untouched brickwalls cannot be a sure evidence for using a bug.
*edited for wrong word*
Last edited by Tonkyhonk on Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
