Tree Formula Discussion

[ElGato]

Gato, pretty sure that's not the formula, that's the one I had worked out in W3, and I had some discrepancies with it, although they could be from the still undetermined -/+ at the end

Well it's worked for me in the past

[DatOneGuy]

Yea it worked for me too, but I ran into a few trees W3 that fell outside of it, they could be explained if the +- was +/- 10, but some has suggested it's lower.

Also, to alpha and others, we're not interested in 'purchasing' some 'possibly working' formula, that's not the point of any of it, the point is to come up with a formula that is correct while testing the ones that currently stand up to most or all data tested.

[ElGato]

Yea it worked for me too, but I ran into a few trees W3 that fell outside of it, they could be explained if the +- was +/- 10, but some has suggested it's lower.

Also, to alpha and others, we're not interested in 'purchasing' some 'possibly working' formula, that's not the point of any of it, the point is to come up with a formula that is correct while testing the ones that currently stand up to most or all data tested.

then possibly you calculated your table ql wrong as most I've seen in Sodom were supposed to be q275.25 or something.

[novaalpha]

Yea it worked for me too, but I ran into a few trees W3 that fell outside of it, they could be explained if the +- was +/- 10, but some has suggested it's lower.

Also, to alpha and others, we're not interested in 'purchasing' some 'possibly working' formula, that's not the point of any of it, the point is to come up with a formula that is correct while testing the ones that currently stand up to most or all data tested.

I have the formula but say thx to ewlol, you're not getting it in any forseeable future.

PS still looking for buyer. Very expensive.

[DatOneGuy]

Yea it worked for me too, but I ran into a few trees W3 that fell outside of it, they could be explained if the +- was +/- 10, but some has suggested it's lower.

Also, to alpha and others, we're not interested in 'purchasing' some 'possibly working' formula, that's not the point of any of it, the point is to come up with a formula that is correct while testing the ones that currently stand up to most or all data tested.

I have the formula but say thx to ewlol, you're not getting it in any forseeable future.

PS still looking for buyer. Very expensive.

Would still be pointless, because again if you sold us the 'formula' (which isn't guaranteed correct anyway, it's just your 'best guess' as it is for anything so far) I'd just post it for everyone which would make it pointless for future sale.
Go post your selling of your 'formula' somewhere else please, and keep it out of this thread that is for gathering a large sample to test such formulas.

[boshaw]

selling formulas now eh?

[novaalpha]

(which isn't guaranteed correct anyway, it's just your 'best guess' as it is for anything so far)

It works 100 out of 100, but I'm not interested in telling you more than that.

Carry on.

selling formulas now eh?

Instead of giving valuable stuff free, yes, I guess.

[cobaltjones]

Would still be pointless, because again if you sold us the 'formula' (which isn't guaranteed correct anyway, it's just your 'best guess' as it is for anything so far)

Literally every formula you or anyone else could come up with would be a "best guess" unless it came from loftar himself.

[Saphireking65]

Why would anyone buy a formula that they already have? It's not like knowing the formula will suddenly make all your trees better.

[sabinati]

it's not like science is hard