you mean the guys who u aggroed for fun on the rob. cuz its sooo funny (and totally not dumb) to agro newbie's at the rob with the new bugmegaskills.
and the guys who are not so happy with ur trading style..
i can say that most ppl (not you and ur guys and not g1real and his mate) have made good ingame experiences with me. so where is the point ?
the problem still is that you guys get MUCH to strong and still grow up faster than others (cuz you have still some HQ stuff left from this coal). for example the hq trees. you get it from a epic herb table who was madet out of epic boards (where you get from the epic saw).
maybe they should rebuild the whole village and get a lp shrink to 1million.
or we become a complete map reset ^^
ps: the remove all smithing tools wont help here.
-
VoodooDog
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm
-
BenHa
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:09 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
I truly laughed my ass off. That was good voodooVoodooDog wrote: or we become a complete map reset ^^
-
kLauE
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
lol then i lose over 6 mio without using any bugs... such a great idea faggotVoodooDog wrote: maybe they should rebuild the whole village and get a lp shrink to 1million.
-
VoodooDog
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
it dosnt implement you when i write "they".
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
VoodooDog wrote:it dosnt implement you when i write "they".
Ah now I get it, the devs should rebuiold our city and shrink their own lp to 1 million, that makes much more sense. Because then we would truly be the new gods of the game
-
VoodooDog
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
ahh guys. whats wrong with you. even when i say "lower ther lp to 3million" you would cry like babies.
the most stuff in ur village have to get destroyed cuz its to hq.
the most stuff in ur village have to get destroyed cuz its to hq.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
I do not disagree with that, we told the devs in our bugreport that there is still some stuff with qualities between 200-900 left, but they did not take it from us. If this is fixed I am totally fine with that. But lowering stats in an alpha, this is the first time I ever hear about using a method like this. Because although our high q materials might be destroying parts of the game, our stats are not. There are still chars out there who should be stronger than us.
High lvl chars can be useful on discovering bugs that wouldn't have been noticed otherwise etc. etc.
But even if the devs decide to decrease our lp or attributes I am fine with that as long as they don't take lp I would have gotten anyways.
High lvl chars can be useful on discovering bugs that wouldn't have been noticed otherwise etc. etc.
But even if the devs decide to decrease our lp or attributes I am fine with that as long as they don't take lp I would have gotten anyways.
-
Jackard
- Posts: 8849
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
- Location: fucking curios how do they work
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
I, for one, welcome our new hammy overlords.
-
swebonny
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:17 am
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
Haha Xybb, so this is where the 6-7k damage is coming from. I thought you were joking all the time.
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.
You don't happen to have character progress stored, do you? I think fairest thing would be to reset them to the LP they had before the bug abuse, plus LP an average active character earned since then. Same for stats. Primary bug items were fixed IIRC. I think we can live if they keep the secondary ones, as long as they have reasonable quality (ie not greater than best items acquired through legitimate means).
However, I think this should only be done this once, because there was no warning against it. Next time somebody finds a bug and abuses it without reporting it to the devs, just delete all of his characters completely. We can't have alpha testers behave like that.
However, I think this should only be done this once, because there was no warning against it. Next time somebody finds a bug and abuses it without reporting it to the devs, just delete all of his characters completely. We can't have alpha testers behave like that.