Uac VS Melee
Which side do you take and why ?
So, this is not the average "should i go melee or uac?" it's a discussion why!
i remmber how at the start of w4 just about everyone wanted to go uac, we had given a better balance, thus making it worthwile as a real combat style,i remmber my joy if finally being able to punch someone in the face to death, and even at one point w5 i heard that(when i came back) it was nice to hear the great punching style had now become a true way of life in the hearthlands.
but then dark thoughs came, and then these images, then came the videos, what happened? Where was this world of punching that i had dreamed off?
ok that's enough BS for one post, point is, i keep sein ScreenShots of all sorts of ppl, and none of em seem to be UAC, my question is, why? i believe UAC was balanced more or less so it was possible to use it in open combat vs a melee, but, does anyone actually go UAC ? or just melee still way to OP?
Update: what ppl said so far
Uac- 3
Melee- 6
Both/Axe- 3
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Who are you?
Last edited by Skorm on Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
-
dagrimreefah3
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:26 pm
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Who are you?
just one?dagrimreefah3 wrote:So how many UAC VS. Melee threads are you going to start?
somehow, i don't trust your name nor your post count.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
-
dagrimreefah3
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: Who are you?
My bad. The one I was thinking of was posted by someone else lol.Skorm wrote:just one?dagrimreefah3 wrote:So how many UAC VS. Melee threads are you going to start?
somehow, i don't trust your name nor your post count.
Why don't you trust my name?
BTW the topic at hand: I stick faithfully to UAC. I've been pantsing people for a while now...
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Who are you?
sounds like a question an alt would askdagrimreefah3 wrote:My bad. The one I was thinking of was posted by someone else lol.Skorm wrote:just one?dagrimreefah3 wrote:So how many UAC VS. Melee threads are you going to start?
somehow, i don't trust your name nor your post count.
Why don't you trust my name?
BTW the topic at hand: I stick faithfully to UAC. I've been pantsing people for a while now...
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
-
btaylor
- Posts: 1692
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:37 am
Re: Who are you?
The unfed mind devours itself. - Gore Vidal
-
MightySheep
- Posts: 2534
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:18 pm
Re: Who are you?
well the way I see it, you should either be uac/melee or uac/mm because carrying bow is 2 hands and sword is 1 hand and because it's too much effort to raise all 3 at least until you're really pro. Benefits to pure uac ? 2 travellers sax :] + only have to worry about that one skill. Benefits to UAC/Melee, I've heard it's better in endgame, you deal more damage (2:1, melee:uac is optimal ratio afaik, e.g. 100uac 200melee)
I was gonna be pure UAC but then I got some nice swordz and had to become melee. and it looks better tbh if you're carrying soldiers sword and travellers sack you look like a boss but if you're just walking around with empty hands you look a bit dull
I was gonna be pure UAC but then I got some nice swordz and had to become melee. and it looks better tbh if you're carrying soldiers sword and travellers sack you look like a boss but if you're just walking around with empty hands you look a bit dull
-
TheMan
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:04 am
Re: Who are you?
I hear you I though i was gonna go UA but then i was like "lol cool a sword i look badass with this in my hand" so i went Melee...
AB POS
-
VoodooDog
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm
Re: Who are you?
IAM THE GREATEST SLAYER OF ALL TIME DAMN YA
-
Skorm
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:01 am
- Location: on a house, with a computer
Re: Who are you?
as i do agree swords looks bad-ass and dangerous, i like UAC for the same reason, the point in goin for 2 skills is that, goin pure would mean having a higher skill, and a uac is as as deadly, you don't know, you don't expect it, someone can just pnch all of a sudden, and if it has a good skill level, i can do a lot of damage before you realise, that's one of the many things i go about uac, in the other hand, while melee does ( A LOT) more damage at least early games, it req's IP for even the most basic attack, wich is a pain, not only takes time, but the element of surprise as well. at least for hunting no matter what, you need a sharp tool, so, +1 to melee in that sense.MightySheep wrote:well the way I see it, you should either be uac/melee or uac/mm because carrying bow is 2 hands and sword is 1 hand and because it's too much effort to raise all 3 at least until you're really pro. Benefits to pure uac ? 2 travellers sax :] + only have to worry about that one skill. Benefits to UAC/Melee, I've heard it's better in endgame, you deal more damage (2:1, melee:uac is optimal ratio afaik, e.g. 100uac 200melee)
I was gonna be pure UAC but then I got some nice swordz and had to become melee. and it looks better tbh if you're carrying soldiers sword and travellers sack you look like a boss but if you're just walking around with empty hands you look a bit dull
Anyway, i am a uac for sure.
~art By SacreDoomd_datica wrote:Get the damn server back up before I go back to having a life
USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST
