LOL realy? sooo thats why this thread was like Pande v RUA and now its Pande v NNN... correct me if im wrong?
So now Pande has just new enemy that grown just after RUA ..left or smth like that?
-
ClumsySmurf
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:24 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Last edited by ClumsySmurf on Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
lawton
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:11 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
they are one but they are differentClumsySmurf wrote:LOL realy? sooo thats why this thread was like Pande v RUA and now its Pande v NNN... correct me if im wrong?
-
cauda_draconis
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Actually, i think NNN have done an excellent work. They detected the weak link in your plan and striked right there. If you did not see the work, that stands behing actual "just summon some guys before the enemies do the same", then you are fools.
You lose your assault, and instead of admitting the lose, you have though "oh wait, so we did burn that 15k bricks and 400 wrought for nothing", and make the only think you could - cry "YOU BAGOUSERS!!!111" on forum.
You lose your assault, and instead of admitting the lose, you have though "oh wait, so we did burn that 15k bricks and 400 wrought for nothing", and make the only think you could - cry "YOU BAGOUSERS!!!111" on forum.
-
Qant
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Yes, exactly the same way Pandemonium isn't equal to Sodom.Koru wrote:Sure, we are new guys, RUA just don't play, we are NNN.
This never never were Pande v RUA. At the moment this thread was started RUA already didn't exist.ClumsySmurf wrote:LOL realy? sooo thats why this thread was like Pande v RUA and now its Pande v NNN... correct me if im wrong?
-
Koru
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:06 am
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Sodom wasn't even on w5, sorry mate. HVs are same = same ppl.
-
Qant
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
I know that there wasnt Sodom at w5, and that is exactly my point. And I dont know what "same" HVs you mean. The only one I could think of is Earthquake (NNN vault), which is located right under Last Vegas (former RUA vault). But Earthquake never belonged to RUA, and Last Vegas was already destroyed by the time we started forming what will be NNN later.Koru wrote:Sodom wasn't even on w5, sorry mate. HVs are same = same ppl.
-
Koya
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:01 am
- Location: Ukraine, Lviv
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Bot that summons scents... what a magnificent idea
Thank you guys...
ThunderCat
AD City Lawspeaker
=================
Those who speak of equality and peace will lead the future. Those who live in hate will remain in the past, or we will all perish as one.
AD City Lawspeaker
=================
Those who speak of equality and peace will lead the future. Those who live in hate will remain in the past, or we will all perish as one.
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
-
ClumsySmurf
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:24 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
I dont assult anyone here. I have this much respect for NNN guys that use really deliberately theires advantages and disadvantages, but as i said, they do this at all costs. this game should be symulation of reality like jorb and loftar wanted and now...? U realy enjoy having winning it in this way? On every war was some unbroken rules that makes it more law-abiding. If u make new unfair rules here, there will be no one who can even play against u, and what then ? Rule the world wothout enemys its just.. borring?
-
Qant
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:15 pm
Re: War between the Panda and the NNN
Winning in what way? Using guerilla tactics? Yes we like to play this way, and the reasons for this should be obvious.ClumsySmurf wrote:I dont assult anyone here. I have this much respect for NNN guys that use really deliberately theires advantages and disadvantages, but as i said, they do this at all costs. this game should be symulation of reality like jorb and loftar wanted and now...? U realy enjoy having winning it in this way?
Exactly - it would be boring. And that is why back when it was bug-fest all around I stepped forward to start the discussion with Burgingham about how we can make this war more civilized, which in turn lead to all the agreements we made so far. Btw, do you know what was the first agreement we made? We stopped to CS-jump villages and in return we were supposed to not be blamed for bug abuse without hard proofs. And how can I say that they hold onto that agreement when I am looking at all those pages of RAGE from Burgingham and co where they didnt even proven in any way that we used a bot to summon Valten (which we didnt), nor even shown how is it "bug" in any way.ClumsySmurf wrote:I
On every war was some unbroken rules that makes it more law-abiding. If u make new unfair rules here, there will be no one who can even play against u, and what then ? Rule the world wothout enemys its just.. borring?