more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

General discussion and socializing.
VoodooDog
Posts: 856
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm

more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by VoodooDog »

i know its cuz of cleave dmg = str/3 and chop dmg = str/2.
but it feels bit strange

i also dont want to use a stoneaxe :[
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by Potjeh »

Stone axes should really have an abysmal THAC0 modifier.
Image Bottleneck
Lightning4
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 10:40 pm

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by Lightning4 »

Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
User avatar
PhaedrothSP
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 6:07 am

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by PhaedrothSP »

Lightning4 wrote:Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
When you do enough damage, speed isn't that much of an issue.
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by theTrav »

PhaedrothSP wrote:
Lightning4 wrote:Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
When you do enough damage, speed isn't that much of an issue.
Also if you exploit pathing hard enough animals don't get to strike at you many times
User avatar
eql
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:39 am

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by eql »

another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
User avatar
Devour
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:13 am

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by Devour »

eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.
Image
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by theTrav »

Devour wrote:
eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.
Lol, I doubt the 1st ed combat would make a good translation to a computer game... It's not really made for hard and fast rules like computers need. While I think 4th ed was a vastly inferior game I think the mechanics that run it would translate to computers a lot easier.
User avatar
eql
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:39 am

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by eql »

Devour wrote:
eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.
AD&D. nothing else.
User avatar
sami1337
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?

Post by sami1337 »

I hardly ever use cleave as the prey either runs away or dies before being able to use it. To me a sword (any sword) seems to be a much better weapon for hunting as it does more damage as you hit more often and actually keep the battle balanced.
The ones who see things differently.

You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.

Return to “The Inn of Brodgar”