i know its cuz of cleave dmg = str/3 and chop dmg = str/2.
but it feels bit strange
i also dont want to use a stoneaxe :[
-
VoodooDog
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
Stone axes should really have an abysmal THAC0 modifier.
-
Lightning4
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 10:40 pm
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
-
PhaedrothSP
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 6:07 am
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
When you do enough damage, speed isn't that much of an issue.Lightning4 wrote:Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
-
theTrav
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
Also if you exploit pathing hard enough animals don't get to strike at you many timesPhaedrothSP wrote:When you do enough damage, speed isn't that much of an issue.Lightning4 wrote:Stone axes are slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. Like, almost worthless slow. Boar gets +10 initiative and full combat advantage slow.
-
eql
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:39 am
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
-
Devour
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:13 am
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
-
theTrav
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
Lol, I doubt the 1st ed combat would make a good translation to a computer game... It's not really made for hard and fast rules like computers need. While I think 4th ed was a vastly inferior game I think the mechanics that run it would translate to computers a lot easier.Devour wrote:I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
-
eql
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:39 am
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
AD&D. nothing else.Devour wrote:I hope you mean first edition or AD&D. Best combat systems EVER.eql wrote:another point might be that we desperately need a DnD style implementation for combat.
-
sami1337
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 1:52 pm
Re: more dmg with a q10 stone axe then with a q30 bronze sword ?
I hardly ever use cleave as the prey either runs away or dies before being able to use it. To me a sword (any sword) seems to be a much better weapon for hunting as it does more damage as you hit more often and actually keep the battle balanced.
The ones who see things differently.
You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.
And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.