Not sure if legal

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.
User avatar
fallout
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by fallout »

iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.
User avatar
Chakravanti
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by Chakravanti »

fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.
Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
painhertz
Posts: 6185
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
Location: Louisiana

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by painhertz »

Essentialism wrote:I've been spamming le door for 5 min, no way to get in without destroying the house or claim.
The house is as destroyable as a palisade. There's nothing illegal there.
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
User avatar
MagicManICT
Posts: 18435
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by MagicManICT »

Essentialism wrote:I've been spamming le door for 5 min, no way to get in without destroying the house or claim.
Umm.. yeah, good luck with that. The sprint off thing usually only works when you're actually stuck on something. It might work for getting in doors, but I've never bothered trying.
painhertz wrote:The house is as destroyable as a palisade. There's nothing illegal there.
Yup.

From RoB:

Soak Value 25
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
User avatar
fallout
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by fallout »

Chakravanti wrote:
fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.
Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.
Chak being Chak, I did read the thread, what more could I have added to this useless thing?
ImAwesome
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:35 pm

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by ImAwesome »

theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house
User avatar
TeckXKnight
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by TeckXKnight »

ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house
Ya, I gave that some thought too. I was thinking they likely did that to hide the character in there until the scents decayed then they could declaim and re-set their claim to a more convenient location. While they're waiting for the scents to decay they're likely on an alt.

Though you're correct that you could probably grief a newbie like this too.
User avatar
Chakravanti
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by Chakravanti »

fallout wrote:
Chakravanti wrote:
fallout wrote:iirc, jorb nuked a palisade hearth vault before, so I am sure he would do this too. so your only problem is getting him on to do it.
Never mind the consensus amount the vets. Listen to this guy who didn't even read the thread and makes up references to events without providing evidence for behavior counter to the development team's stated intervention philosophies.
Chak being Chak, I did read the thread, what more could I have added to this useless thing?
Oh, are we done being sarcastic now? We were doing so well. What happened, bro?
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Phaen
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:17 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by Phaen »

ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house
If that stake disallows exiting and the victim is trapped in with his HF... damn... that means not even a remote village invite could save them since it can't be done when people are inside.
Image
killette2
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:11 am

Re: Not sure if legal

Post by killette2 »

Phaen wrote:
ImAwesome wrote:theres a hf in front of cave entrance, you're all just assuming hfs are inside house...

even if there is a hf inside the person it belongs to is trapped in there...thread result: new way to grief, alt claim in front of someone's unclaimed house
If that stake disallows exiting and the victim is trapped in with his HF... damn... that means not even a remote village invite could save them since it can't be done when people are inside.
They would just take the stake down and rebuild it.

Return to “In Congress Assembled”