-
Setting
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:37 pm
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
I am that guy pr0 nao...any problem?? Come with me....=)=)!!
-
Elaes
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:58 am
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
(i would've not said you was one of the 2 doing that but i confirm ur tard on do those stuff settSetting wrote:I am that guy pr0 nao...any problem?? Come with me....=)=)!!
-
Setting
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:37 pm
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
I just wanna say that i was starting to insult when i read nao saying: "We will use a bug to jump your walls"....Cuz i dont like the bugs,exploits,macros or cheats...Nothing else
Peace, fun and weed!
Peace, fun and weed!
Last edited by Setting on Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
NaoWhut
- Posts: 4852
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
- Location: |.
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
Err.. didn't i say
"You ever seen a bug jump before?"
when you were all staring at me, and then
keep quiet for the rest of the time since I
knew you'd react, then got you all to 1 shp
so that you ran around and thorns KO'ed you?
"You ever seen a bug jump before?"
when you were all staring at me, and then
keep quiet for the rest of the time since I
knew you'd react, then got you all to 1 shp
so that you ran around and thorns KO'ed you?


-
gradouble
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:43 pm
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
And boar meatSetting wrote:
Peace, fun and weed!
don't abuse of it hehe
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
Everyone knows wicker basket signs full of boughs = bug jump
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
Kaios
- Posts: 9268
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
Man, you completely overreacted to my post. I was implying exactly what you said. In past worlds Aracos has been the "white knight" type player like you said, and even refused to go on raids that involved bug using. I'm not saying you guys are using bugs now, only some abuse of poor siege mechanics, but to act so cocky isn't going unnoticed by anyone.Elaes wrote: even a braindead monkey know that in our current world we have only villainous large factions if you wanna consider it, is nothing new, and is even more common to explain facts, from your view in a thread (notice the pattern of previous post of nao with "they attacked me in 5v1 ! i killed 2 ! im a hero! ) or dis with "we raided the evil heartvault place of xxxx people". Sure everybody has his reason to think to be right : aracos love to try to act as a white knight but since the game (and this has been stated more then 1 time) push you to get advantage over the weakest target (or act in a suitable situation), it's simply pure hypocrisy we dont deny it.
If you attack a better group and fail your a noob, if you succeed then your a good player if you give them loss they rage.
mainly those post in congress are just for the lulz / give information to the player base about what's going on outside their village, and spoil a bit of the "current alliances in progress" in each world. Here you see that Winterfell tought to be in an alliance with RiC, found out that instead was just a "not aggressive pact", and in the end found out ainran is in total alliance with RiC and not just having a "not aggressive pact with them", enough to let them use crossroad to move in differents RiC outposts (and honestly i can even understood that koru had to think : yeye screw aracos and his lil gimpy town, i've ainran on my side, im safe and i will have no problem with him or anybody else).
None of your posts have been any more useful than mine, just more shit in a toilet thread.Elaes wrote: p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow![]()
-
Setting
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:37 pm
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
I know that there not too much walljump bugs atm but with ppl that play 24/7 everything its possible...bmjclark wrote:Everyone knows wicker basket signs full of boughs = bug jump
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
I think im the only one in ainran who is literally on 24/7 =p.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
Elaes
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:58 am
Re: War between winterfell, ainran and R&C.
i not overreacted kaios, im actually really chilled up and laughing, and as i said on start, you was implying that while everybody knows this already (that's the allusion to even a braindead monkey knows it nowKaios wrote:Man, you completely overreacted to my post. I was implying exactly what you said. In past worlds Aracos has been the "white knight" type player like you said, and even refused to go on raids that involved bug using. I'm not saying you guys are using bugs now, only some abuse of poor siege mechanics, but to act so cocky isn't going unnoticed by anyone.Elaes wrote: even a braindead monkey know that in our current world we have only villainous large factions if you wanna consider it, is nothing new, and is even more common to explain facts, from your view in a thread (notice the pattern of previous post of nao with "they attacked me in 5v1 ! i killed 2 ! im a hero! ) or dis with "we raided the evil heartvault place of xxxx people". Sure everybody has his reason to think to be right : aracos love to try to act as a white knight but since the game (and this has been stated more then 1 time) push you to get advantage over the weakest target (or act in a suitable situation), it's simply pure hypocrisy we dont deny it.
If you attack a better group and fail your a noob, if you succeed then your a good player if you give them loss they rage.
mainly those post in congress are just for the lulz / give information to the player base about what's going on outside their village, and spoil a bit of the "current alliances in progress" in each world. Here you see that Winterfell tought to be in an alliance with RiC, found out that instead was just a "not aggressive pact", and in the end found out ainran is in total alliance with RiC and not just having a "not aggressive pact with them", enough to let them use crossroad to move in differents RiC outposts (and honestly i can even understood that koru had to think : yeye screw aracos and his lil gimpy town, i've ainran on my side, im safe and i will have no problem with him or anybody else).
None of your posts have been any more useful than mine, just more shit in a toilet thread.Elaes wrote: p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow![]()
maybe, then we can agree : since u didnt needed explaination, both your post and mine could've just replaced with a spam or +1 counterKaios wrote:None of your posts have been any more useful than mine, just more shit in a toilet thread.Elaes wrote: p.s. im sure i dont have to explain to a player like you stuff like that, but then your post was just usefull as a second asshole on the right elbow![]()