Lp debate

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

Hourai_Chimes wrote:inventor should be arguing more against bots instead of against curiosities since that is all I hear, hell I think he is using the flaws of the curiosity system to show how bad botting is instead of the reverse! Image
I like the curio system(its quite unique) , but i also liked the old lp system i just wish they could be combined.

neither is a bad idea, and since bots are inevitable why not make the rest of the game more fun for everyone who isn't one.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
Hourai_Chimes
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:44 pm

Re: Lp debate

Post by Hourai_Chimes »

and combining it how? not sure if you thought your really thought your plans through Image

also trolling someone (con #2) does not make good argument cases :<
You laugh at me because I am different. I laugh at you because you are all the same.
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

ok i removed the trollish act. sry tech. i meant only as a joke.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

Hourai_Chimes wrote:and combining it how? not sure if you thought your really thought your plans through Image

also trolling someone (con #2) does not make good argument cases :<
by combine i mean leave the curio system as it is, and institute the old lp system with about a 50% lp gain that it had before so people can do stuff while they wait for there curios to tick away.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
User avatar
Patchouli_Knowledge
Posts: 2248
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 1:57 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by Patchouli_Knowledge »

Can I ask you to please edit your post instead of consistently double-posting?
Image
-=The law of inverse desire=- The chances of dropping what you want is the reciprocal of how much you want it.
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

yes, i didnt mean to double post ,i should have edited.

on another note.

civilization building lp is a great encouragement towards building some pretty incredible things like the ones i saw back before the curio system. I just think it should return.

Like back when i was in new brodgar, that city was so huge is was scary, and it was built on the labor of noob slaves who needed starter lp.

we had over 100 population at one point.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
Hourai_Chimes
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:44 pm

Re: Lp debate

Post by Hourai_Chimes »

and it only took a couple of raiders to bring it down...
You laugh at me because I am different. I laugh at you because you are all the same.
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

Hourai_Chimes wrote:and it only took a couple of raiders to bring it down...
Not my fault, The leader wouldn't let me commission an exterior wall we had no defense. i had all the labor and resources allocated, so much for following orders.

most of the population were noobs so they were just cannon fodder, although we did thwart a couple raid attempt prior to losing.

onionfighter has been watching the thread for a bit and hasnt posted, i am worried.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
User avatar
Onionfighter
Posts: 2957
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:45 am
Location: Mordor

Re: Lp debate

Post by Onionfighter »

inventer110 wrote:Why cant we have normal LP gain as well as curiosities? instead of the endless debates over which is better?'

just an idea.

i am suggesting this thread as a debate towards achieving or dismissing the above goal.
The debate already happened. The old way lost. The only thing of any value in this thread is what Patchouli_Knowledge wrote, and that is the only reason this doesn't get sent to hel.
Cheerleader
inventer110
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Post by inventer110 »

this is not a debate between the old and new but combining the two.

the devs tried the old way, and the curio, why not try them together.

I admit the thread name may make it appear to be similar, but i do see a difference in idea.
you can rename the thread if you like/ you have the power.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."

Return to “Critique & Ideas”