-
Valten21
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:40 pm
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
Re: Curious about Crashes?
556.
You may have foiled the plans of BAD-EVIL this time, but there is no rest for the wicked.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: Curious about Crashes?
Bigger numbers = Better quality, right?Justin Bieber Facebook Page wrote:39.448.463 like this
-
ramones
- Posts: 3077
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:03 pm
- Location: I am a man who walks alone'
Re: Curious about Crashes?
I am evil because I abuse game mechanics by picking 7 branches from 4th phase of tree growth and again from grown tree! I am evil!
W16.1 - Pet Sematary (hermit)
W8 - Hermitage
W7 - Emerald City
W6 - Gomorrah
W5 - Pandemonium
W4 - Angkor
W3 - Angkor
W8 - Hermitage
W7 - Emerald City
W6 - Gomorrah
W5 - Pandemonium
W4 - Angkor
W3 - Angkor
-
ewlol
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: Curious about Crashes?
You seem to have some strange idea in your head that I have no respect for Ainran people. But that's simply not true, at least for Valten, who is a cool guy. (I am speaking directly to BMJClark)
I don't know why you are fooling yourself into thinking that people who no longer play should be disregarded in their thoughts and observations. I have every right to give my opinion. This strange idea that you have planted in your heads that people who no longer play are worth nothing is completely wrong. Should sports observers who have retired be fired from ESPN? Should Bill Clinton be unable to comment on any matters regarding the presidency? Am I unable to give my opinion, or even observe for that matter, on matters of the game currently? Why was this posted on the forum then? For what purpose other than flaunting was this thread created?
Your pitiful excuse to avoid comments from those like me has worn thin. Perhaps you should be less arrogant yourself and more open?
Secondly, you should stop bringing things up from world 5. Ainran said it themselves that they felt relationships can be freely broken at the start of the new world, and that they are free to kill/slaughter/murder/whatever, and the past should be disregarded because "it's a clean slate now!!". Why are you holding me and burgingham to some other standard then? All you do is bring up some fault in the past (is it even a fault?) and use that as some ammunition against us. We are talking about the issues now. Why are you bringing up something from the past? I know I didn't say anything about how you were/what you did in world 5.
As for my response to valten. It's coming.
I don't know why you are fooling yourself into thinking that people who no longer play should be disregarded in their thoughts and observations. I have every right to give my opinion. This strange idea that you have planted in your heads that people who no longer play are worth nothing is completely wrong. Should sports observers who have retired be fired from ESPN? Should Bill Clinton be unable to comment on any matters regarding the presidency? Am I unable to give my opinion, or even observe for that matter, on matters of the game currently? Why was this posted on the forum then? For what purpose other than flaunting was this thread created?
Your pitiful excuse to avoid comments from those like me has worn thin. Perhaps you should be less arrogant yourself and more open?
Secondly, you should stop bringing things up from world 5. Ainran said it themselves that they felt relationships can be freely broken at the start of the new world, and that they are free to kill/slaughter/murder/whatever, and the past should be disregarded because "it's a clean slate now!!". Why are you holding me and burgingham to some other standard then? All you do is bring up some fault in the past (is it even a fault?) and use that as some ammunition against us. We are talking about the issues now. Why are you bringing up something from the past? I know I didn't say anything about how you were/what you did in world 5.
As for my response to valten. It's coming.
-
Koru
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:06 am
Re: Curious about Crashes?
Even AD don't complain about way they are being raided, besides real argue is about server crashes.
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Curious about Crashes?
Your post to me sounded like you were trying to sling mud at the method we raided them when it is pretty much the only possible way to siege a town right now because there really is no siege mechanic in place as you well know. There were ways they could of stopped it, but we decided to camp for several hours to prevent it. I'm not saying that exploiting mechanics is ideal, but as far as i'm concerned anything you can do to get ur ram to a brickwall of an enemy town is fair play (short of some crazy ass bugs that instantly dries a ram or something of the sort), considering it is damn near impossible unless the town makes some mistake (unsealed cornerposts) or is just inactive all together. The siege took legitimate effort, exploit of summoning mechanic or not.ewlol wrote:...
As for my comment about opinions of people not playing the game or w/e i had said, i probably shouldn't generalize like that. It's burginghams opinion i don't give a shit about, as he comes off as a bitter man who lost at the game and now wants to shit on anyone who still enjoys playing it, even in its broken state. And honestly, i would just throw him on my ignore list if the stupid forum would let you ignore moderators =|.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: Curious about Crashes?
That is just you making it up. I couldn't be any less bitter. You guys have just turned into some self-centered, arrogant circle jerk that cannot see the truth anymore since it would reveal those double standards you are playing with.
As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
-
Koru
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:06 am
Re: Curious about Crashes?
Your posts don't critique only game but also players and that is the problem in my opinion. You didn't mind use same exploits last world as an active player and you try to blame ppl who do the same now.
You are obviously right about broken siege mechanic but nobody has doubts about it. All aware of that players take present gameplay with all advantages and disadvantages. We can say there is informal agreement for accepted exploits and one of them is using brickwalls and beds, cus it is better to have a substitute of siege mechanism than 24h camping a ram that will be destoryed by one alt.
You are obviously right about broken siege mechanic but nobody has doubts about it. All aware of that players take present gameplay with all advantages and disadvantages. We can say there is informal agreement for accepted exploits and one of them is using brickwalls and beds, cus it is better to have a substitute of siege mechanism than 24h camping a ram that will be destoryed by one alt.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: Curious about Crashes?
Well, just carry on. Topic here was AD I think, so hate them and not me.