Curious about Crashes?

General discussion and socializing.
User avatar
Valten21
Posts: 2053
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:40 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by Valten21 »

Well said Korush.
You may have foiled the plans of BAD-EVIL this time, but there is no rest for the wicked.
plaguespark
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:22 pm

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by plaguespark »

burgingham wrote:As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
Your butthurt experience matters not
iceheart
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:08 am

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by iceheart »

To be fair, a lot of us are going on double standard here. Given an example is Pandemonium back in world 5 tried to assault LadyGoo's village with a ton of cornerpost which goes around the mechanics of the 12 hour necessity of wait to seal a cornerpost as well as summoning people into that bubble fort. This was thwarted by what they accused to be a summon bot. While I do not condone what he did there, I am not particularly keen on him speaking against Ainran for a similar action (albeit some differences).

That being said , both side are exploiting in a sense. This does make one more or less wrong than the others and consider the game policy and metagame, it is just another day in Haven. One thing I want to touch on is that this was set up by an unsealed cornerpost which most of us forumers often rant on how important it is. Finally this bed exploit is ironically what could have made Burgingham's attack a success though arguable gates would have made Pandemonium or Ainran's assault have a bit more option (though it would get cockc blocked by statues anyhow.

Speaking of which, being able to log onto your own assault fort should be a feature in the new siege enginne with limitation. At the same measure, summoning people into another's claim that you do not have permission to should be blocked. This won't disrupt courier alts but at the same measure you can't summon an army into an enemy village just because ONE FREAKING VILLAGER is a spy or, god forbids, got hacked.

I am not on anyone's side but my own but just wanted to point things out that somewhat bothers me.
USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by Potjeh »

The new system should abolish all forms of teleportation, summoning included. If you wanna summon someone, go to his log-out location instead.

Also, fuck area transitions.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by burgingham »

plaguespark wrote:
burgingham wrote:As I have pointed out before am I in the much better position to do proper critiqueing than you for the above mentioned reasons of you being so caught up in it.
Your butthurt experience matters not
Allrighty then I told you not to troll around with your alt. You ignored it. You and your alt both get avacation.
User avatar
WarpedWiseMan
Posts: 1059
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: A throne.

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by WarpedWiseMan »

I believe Burg's entire point is that several of us have been saying "the game is broken because you must exploit to be successful" while Ainran (specifically bmjclark) has been saying "the game is not broken and if you don't play this version you should shut up".

Ainran is full of liars and cheaters and dickheads. NOONE DENIES THIS. And while I too, respect Valten's positions and aura of honesty, the fact remains that they are as much a part of the cancer that is killing Haven & Hearth as the vault using Russians, the developers apathy and the non new player friendly world.

And saying there is a formal agreement of accepted exploits, bug uses etc. is fucking moronic. Like a retard's version of the 1980's MAD policy. And who decides these rules? That's right the bug using dicks themselves...hahahahaha. Just like the United Nations.

Plus, Burg never blamed anyone for using them, he simply stated the facts in a less coherent way. Allow me to clarify what I think he meant: CONGRATULATIONS ON WINNING A BROKEN, LOPSIDEDLY UNFAIR GAME AGAINST NOBODY OF CONSEQUENCE YOU ARE THE CHAMPIONS OF ZILCH. *twiddles finger in the air*
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
-Avatar by SacreDoom

Image
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by burgingham »

Thank you. If I ever go into politics I will have you write my speeches. So you better start learning German now.
User avatar
DDDsDD999
Posts: 5766
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:31 am

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by DDDsDD999 »

ewlol wrote:I don't know why you are fooling yourself into thinking that people who no longer play should be disregarded in their thoughts and observations. I have every right to give my opinion. This strange idea that you have planted in your heads that people who no longer play are worth nothing is completely wrong. Should sports observers who have retired be fired from ESPN? Should Bill Clinton be unable to comment on any matters regarding the presidency? Am I unable to give my opinion, or even observe for that matter, on matters of the game currently?
,___________________________________________,
/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
|Must have these many Dhelms to post in forums -->|
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|
|. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|
\___________________________________________/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
____________________|_|____________________
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
bmjclark
Posts: 4053
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by bmjclark »

WarpedWiseMan wrote: "the game is not broken and if you don't play this version you should shut up".
bmjclark wrote:..... anyone who still enjoys playing it,even in its broken state.......
bmjclark wrote:.......it is pretty much the only possible way to siege a town right now because there really is no siege mechanic in place as you well know.....
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
User avatar
WarpedWiseMan
Posts: 1059
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: A throne.

Re: Curious about Crashes?

Post by WarpedWiseMan »

I'm not saying you are wrong Mr. Canada, just that you have said, in essence, "You aren't playing, why do you care?" or "If you aren't playing this version of the game your opinion doesn't really count."

I'm not interested enough to go back through the gigantic threads in which we've all seen you say something like the above and post them again. But when people read that, and then you change the tone to "Well, really there's no other option." it sounds like you are a flippin' and a floppin' so you don't look and read like a hypocrite. But I don't think you are a hypocrite. Just Canadian. Which is approximately 2 million times worse.
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.
-Avatar by SacreDoom

Image

Return to “The Inn of Brodgar”