What to do about Vaults

[brohammed]

What, no continuing discussions? Fuck the necro convention and fuck you.

[MagicManICT]

Some people don't know the rules around here. Ignore the idiots. It's still a relevant conversation (if I could be bothered to bring myself around to reading the whole thread again to see what was and wasn't said).

with that said... think the rules say something about adding something important to the convo, and I certainly didn't see that with the necro post. (I'm not even sure where he's quoting from.) I say if a person is going to necro an old discussion and open it back up, at least give the reader some information about what's in the thread so it shows everyone what's going.

Therefore (so that I'm contributing something to the thread): I think there already plans to eliminate vaults, but we'll have to wait for out overlords to return from their contractual positions to code them up.

[Jackard]

What, no continuing discussions? Fuck the necro convention and fuck you.

just to clarify:

• necros are fine (where still applicable)
• spam is not

too often people end up with the latter, hence the backlash

[evilboy666]

You cant kill a snake at its hole, neither destroy his hole, you must get it out and fight, or smash the snakes head before it gets strong.

[Kriegwolf]

I just came to a thought... What if parallel walls have to have a 1-tile space between 'em? (probably won't work 'cuz we can put there a statue anyway).
Also, what about destructible cliffs? And destructible village banners and statues (which could drop the authority down a bit more than they give, thus making vaults suicidal).

And i think that sleeping on the ground is a good idea, though sleeping players should have hitboxes (so there'll be no problem with blocking of character's place) and be movable (!), so they can be stolen while sleeping or moved if try to alt block.

Aaaaand how about "only one Haven process on one computer" feature to at least hurt alt users a bit.

[Neon14]

Aaaaand how about "only one Haven process on one computer" feature to at least hurt alt users a bit.

[Kriegwolf]

Aaaaand how about "only one Haven process on one computer" feature to at least hurt alt users a bit.

Tiny progress is still better than no progress.

[MagicManICT]

Given that Haven is written in Java, that's an impossiblity. Not to mention it's easy enough to work around with any other program, anyway, by loading it in a virtual desktop.

[Neon14]

just out of curiosity,wont making V claims get the moose head on the map.
wich kinda reveals the location of the vault...(amirite)
so wouldnt it be better if he just had a HF in the building instead.

Mm, but then another person could VClaim it.

[chocolaterain]

Aaaaand how about "only one Haven process on one computer" feature to at least hurt alt users a bit.

You could just use sandboxie to be able to run multiple clients.