^MickDick wrote:To make things clear, what exactly is the current hypothesis for the lag? (aside from fragmentation of the hard drive)
Is there any way to explain in lay-men's terms?
Also, if you have logs of the server before you did the OS upgrade, have you tried comparing them to current which is laggy?
-
Dill
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
-
loftar
- Posts: 9095
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
I've explained it previously both in this thread and others, but the concrete symptoms are that individual VFS operations seemingly randomly take Really Long (sometimes up to 20 seconds) to complete, particularly metadata-heavy ones, such as open(), rename(), close() and the like. The problem is that I don't know what they are blocking on, nor how to find that out. Processes running sync() or fsync() calls do seem to have particularly high probability of making other processes block, but they are far from exclusively responsible.MickDick wrote:To make things clear, what exactly is the current hypothesis for the lag?
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
Dill
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
Whats the status on the defrag?loftar wrote:I've explained it previously both in this thread and others, but the concrete symptoms are that individual VFS operations seemingly randomly take Really Long (sometimes up to 20 seconds) to complete, particularly metadata-heavy ones, such as open(), rename(), close() and the like. The problem is that I don't know what they are blocking on, nor how to find that out. Processes running sync() or fsync() calls do seem to have particularly high probability of making other processes block, but they are far from exclusively responsible.MickDick wrote:To make things clear, what exactly is the current hypothesis for the lag?
-
Saxony4
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:38 am
- Location: Atlantic Ocean
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
I bet it's not even 10% done. These things take time.Whats the status on the defrag?
loftar wrote:git da mony
-
loftar
- Posts: 9095
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
It doesn't actually have a "progress bar" or anything, so I don't know. See above for estimates.Dill wrote:Whats the status on the defrag?
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
Essentialism
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:10 am
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
Next time you make an announced restart saying 15 minutes left,
atleast give us 15 minutes of play-time, instead of < 5 min

atleast give us 15 minutes of play-time, instead of < 5 min
-
Dill
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
He did give you 15 minutes of play time. Then he shut down the server.Essentialism wrote:Next time you make an announced restart saying 15 minutes left,
atleast give us 15 minutes of play-time, instead of < 5 min![]()
-
Essentialism
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:10 am
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
Message was received at 0:07, server shut down at 0:18
Divide that by 2 because of the massive lagg -> 5 min
Divide that by 2 because of the massive lagg -> 5 min
-
Saxony4
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:38 am
- Location: Atlantic Ocean
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
5m.30s actually.Essentialism wrote:Message was received at 0:07, server shut down at 0:18
Divide that by 2 because of the massive lagg -> 5 min
Last edited by Saxony4 on Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
loftar wrote:git da mony
-
Essentialism
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:10 am
Re: Planned downtime: OS upgrade
How to embarrass yourself in front of the whole HnH community.
Lesson 1 :
Lesson 1 :
Saxony4 wrote:5m.50s actually.Essentialism wrote:Message was received at 0:07, server shut down at 0:18
Divide that by 2 because of the massive lagg -> 5 min