nftyw wrote:If Xanadu decides to hunt us down forever till we quit or get tired of dying that's their call, it'd suck for me since I got pretty used to farming mostly but hey, even if I die or get tired and quit, I got more entertainment out of this alpha than $50 retail stuff off a Gamestop shelf.
Did you leave scents at Macomb or anywhere else? If so, your best may be to identify your character. I can personally say that I would be willing to let you have another chance since you are so new and you probably didn't know the full impact or mechanics of your actions. What I really have a problem with is the extortion and the attacks on villages.
You do know that the only vet who went on either of the raids was me.
Every other single person there was a new player who you apparently will give second chances to.
What about the guys that got nabbed at Chernobyl?
Delamore wanted to tax the entirety of the hearthlands. if he wants to tax his territory thats fine by me but if you want to declare yourself lord of the whole world and tax sovereign towns, prepare to die...again
Onionfighter wrote:I don't care how new you are, if you have left scents at a murder scene, we are going to be after you.
Also, Tecumseh is a character owned by fructose, apparently Fools is an alt account of fructose. Now, why would we want to kill him? . . .
Of all the reasons one would want to kill him, it certainly wasn't because there was a scent on any of my accounts you were tracking that led to me. I stayed out of the political and criminal disputes in this world. At first it was surprising to me at, I was having fun without antagonizing people, but it wasn't as surprising as being cut down by the morality police in the middle of nowhere because I stopped to say "hi" to a wandering hearthling. So congratulations on assuming the role of scent sniffing morality crusaders and subsequently defending the murder of a scentless character in almost the same breath.
Onionfighter wrote:
Did you leave scents at Macomb or anywhere else? If so, your best may be to identify your character. I can personally say that I would be willing to let you have another chance since you are so new and you probably didn't know the full impact or mechanics of your actions. What I really have a problem with is the extortion and the attacks on villages.
Yes, but even so, do you really want to police the world? If the goons claim an area and demand tax from people in that area, that seems fine to me. I cant imagine anyone getting angry over Caketown taxing Cakelanders.
Just keep it geographically limited, so people know where is safe to settle, and where they have to pay a "goon tax", and I am fine with it.
Yea I posted something like that in critiques and ideas, though I should have posted it in this thread. We need to define kingdoms on maplib, or post a map somewhere else because the maplib is maintained by shitballs.
ok, first of all, only 1/25 of the current world is on the map, and secondly, what do you mean maplib is "maintained by shitballs"? it's basically a wiki in image form.
I don't get why you guys are using 'morality' to claim Xanadu was in the wrong. They raided Chernobyl, killed the leader, and left. Anyone unlucky (or gutsy) enough to get in the way got squashed. It happened and can't be changed, so there's no point saying it was 'morally wrong' because they did what they came for and left. At least they didn't raze the whole place.
sikgamer wrote:I don't get why you guys are using 'morality' to claim Xanadu was in the wrong. They raided Chernobyl, killed the leader, and left. Anyone unlucky (or gutsy) enough to get in the way got squashed. It happened and can't be changed, so there's no point saying it was 'morally wrong' because they did what they came for and left. At least they didn't raze the whole place.
Running 200 tiles from town is "in their way"
Also you try razing a place that has a 20,000 brick wall as the only thing worth a damn.