-
Zou
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:09 am
- Location: Canada
-
WatsonX
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:10 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
It's ok if you're not that great of a player. The thing that makes these succession games fun is the crazy shit that goes down. Get a little practice and join usMarsdarth wrote:If only I could get my head around that damn game, this look like fun, I'll be sure to have a look at a few of the saves, but I'd probally trash the fort
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm currently using version .34.07 with the mayday tileset and Lazy Newb Pack Advanced v12. Hopefully that won't happen here, but if it does we'll just revert to an older save.MagicManICT wrote: What version? Any mods? I've been reading on one game where someone used the wrong version and then someone else used their own install with a couple of mods that broke the save for anyone else.
Yes, I believe I embarked near a goblin fort. There seems to be about every type of ore, except iron ores (I cheated).Orcling wrote:Count me also in. Anything nice nearby? Like, a dark goblin fortress or some necromancer towers?
Is that hematite I see there?
EDIT: OP UPDATED
HavenHacked (Haven and Hearth cheats): http://tinyurl.com/havenhacked
-
Zou
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:09 am
- Location: Canada
-
shotgunn902
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:59 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
do we have to narrate our ruling? would make a great story im sure. 
Potjeh wrote:I can't take a moustacheless opponent seriously.
dagrimreefah wrote:Well, 19 months into playing, and NOW this is the most godawful, shittiest, laggiest game i've ever played. GG Jorbtard.
-
WatsonX
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:10 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
What's wrong with .34.07?Zou wrote:Why are you using 34.07?
Its not mandatory, but its encouraged.shotgunn902 wrote:do we have to narrate our ruling? would make a great story im sure.
HavenHacked (Haven and Hearth cheats): http://tinyurl.com/havenhacked
-
shotgunn902
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:59 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
the problem is most people are probably up to the latest version including myself, .34.11
Potjeh wrote:I can't take a moustacheless opponent seriously.
dagrimreefah wrote:Well, 19 months into playing, and NOW this is the most godawful, shittiest, laggiest game i've ever played. GG Jorbtard.
-
popfor
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:14 am
- Yahoo Messenger: rate me, rate me my friend
- Location: E̹̙̺̬̖͈̘̭̙̘̔̈́̍͆͌̋̊̈́̀̎d̡̨̺̠̠̜̲̹͕̯̑̀͂͂̈̇̿̏͝͝g̨̙̻̼͎͖̱͔̗͙̐̅̇͗̈́̔͛̌̌͠ŷ͔̼͓̺̮̪̫̙̬̐͊̀́̊͆͝͝͝ͅ
-
DDDsDD999
- Posts: 5766
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:31 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
Are we following in the boatmurdered tradition of naming a dwarf after a previous leader each reign? I've been playing a fort of my own and naming the dwarves the names of H&H players.





-
shotgunn902
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:59 am
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
am i important enough?DDDsDD999 wrote:Are we following in the boatmurdered tradition of naming a dwarf after a previous leader each reign? I've been playing a fort of my own and naming the dwarves the names of H&H players.
also ya id love to join but it needs to be up to .34.11 for me or its just a no go
Potjeh wrote:I can't take a moustacheless opponent seriously.
dagrimreefah wrote:Well, 19 months into playing, and NOW this is the most godawful, shittiest, laggiest game i've ever played. GG Jorbtard.
-
Zou
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:09 am
- Location: Canada
Re: FORT BALLSACKS
A full 34.07 folder will be uploaded, complete with grafix and the save.
hullo, this is bawhopp

