jadamkaz wrote:ah i remember my run in with odditown they are good ppl im sure the only reason they killed ME is because they are troll hunters and i was a troll
HooRahhh Glorious indeed. Wonderful memories of a wonderful game.Oddity wrote:Glory to W3 Ravenholm.
Perfect sandbox would never have a time limit, that's he point, a sandbox world's evolution over decades. BUT you're right, it does need to be playable. Nothing before nor since has been as unique as H&H, if it were just made "Final" and left alone in a playable condition it would be heaven...Ogrim wrote:Yeah, a new world would be good.
I've got plenty invested in W6, but I can't play in this lag. Build W7 and tell everyone that it will only last 1 year... you'll still have lots of players.
Please bring H&H back into playable condition. All the other sandbox games pale by comparison...
Having a timer also diminishes the value of things. Cattle and chickens just aren't worth it unless you can raise them for 6+ months. Worse would be when the end days are nigh and everyone just abandons the world or begins raiding for the sake of raiding. All rational strategy is lost in place of as much senseless havoc as possible.zacty wrote:eh, ive always liked the haven model, keep the world until there is need for a reset. a set time or even predictable time for a reset would honestly just kill the game for me. i love resets, even whenever ive spent months and months getting everything the way i want it resets are always welcome, but setting in stone or even making it somewhat foreseeable would just kill it by adding in a whole new aspect
This is a very weak argument and I'm glad that I never had to interact with you in-game.eliminator wrote:"oh, everybody has wall bashers and uber warriors... why bother?"
I waited for world 5 reset because of this.
