If it is intended then you should all be directing your anger towards the two people responsible for that decision, to be fair!Tonkyhonk wrote: you know, joco. i do remember loftar mentioning troll brickbashing is intended,
js -
If it is intended then you should all be directing your anger towards the two people responsible for that decision, to be fair!Tonkyhonk wrote: you know, joco. i do remember loftar mentioning troll brickbashing is intended,
I never said it was right BUT if they don't want to get rid of it then that is there problem_Gunnar wrote:you're wrongtkearns wrote:I think your just mad? Am i right? I think im right.
anyone who thinks that trolls are intended by the devs to be used routinely as underground siege weapons has something wrong with their head, sorry guys
go ahead and use them but don't pretend that you're clean after doing so

you know why it is intended, right? not to siege, but to prevent players from shooting it behind the walls. or would you like to insist it was meant to be used for siege? or would you now take it down and accept that he is exploiting and yet saying he is using intended mechanics?Amanda44 wrote:If it is intended then you should all be directing your anger towards the two people responsible for that decision, to be fair!Tonkyhonk wrote: you know, joco. i do remember loftar mentioning troll brickbashing is intended,
js -
I could say many things, real things, funny things, absurd things, kid things, things of attention whore , but.. that guy make a good , VERY GOOD summary of your shits and your hypocrisy , coles, accept your shit ,dont worry , everyone knows here that you'll never be punished.andrikyuzva wrote:jordancoles wrote: Lrn2playlegitlol
#swagThe mechanic is there and it was not some mistake that they'd discovered later that they simply didn't bother to fix (eg. bugrams)Tonkyhonk wrote:you know why it is intended, right? not to siege, but to prevent players from shooting it behind the walls. or would you like to insist it was meant to be used for siege? or would you now take it down and accept that he is exploiting and yet saying he is using intended mechanics?Amanda44 wrote:If it is intended then you should all be directing your anger towards the two people responsible for that decision, to be fair!Tonkyhonk wrote: you know, joco. i do remember loftar mentioning troll brickbashing is intended,
js -
Hilarious. Because of the very low spawn rate on trolls they did as Ninijutsu said, they made them very tough to deal with. In doing so they added this mechanic into the mix. Mining bots clearly make troll spawns more common and therefore more of a potential issue, but telling me that I'm the "cancer that's killing H&H" because I'm fine with using an intended mechanic is just funny to me.joojoo1975 wrote:Face it JC your part of the Cancer that's killing H&H
Check out my pro-tips threadDuhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.

jordancoles wrote:The mechanic is there and it was not some mistake that they'd discovered later that they simply didn't bother to fix (eg. bugrams)
Trolls are able to bash brick walls and it was used to bash a brick wall.
There's no bug about that.
The real bug is that you can "tame" creatures and have them follow you around without being attacked.
this is what people call "opportunism". you sure make a good sample for jorb.jordancoles wrote:Hilarious. Because of the very low spawn rate on trolls they did as Ninijutsu said, they made them very tough to deal with. In doing so they added this mechanic into the mix. Mining bots clearly make troll spawns more common and therefore more of a potential issue, but telling me that I'm the "cancer that's killing H&H" because I'm fine with using an intended mechanic is just funny to me.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22742joojoo1975 wrote:and that's why your part of the Cancer jc.
Oh wait - viewtopic.php?f=31&t=25886 - should always try and be fair.joojoo1975 wrote:
I also like the concept of fairness(something seldom shown currently in H&H)
now, amanda, i wouldnt say joco is a cancer of the game or that sort, i just dislike him personally for reasons, and im not gonna say joojoo is a great contributer or whatever either, BUT contributions are not always visible to everyone. you never know who contributes in what way. just like some who dont show up on the forums can be great contributers with (or without) good reputations ingame. i thought you knew that.Amanda44 wrote:I'm sorry joojoo, I couldn't find your contributions to this great game that you love so much.