-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
Nice to see JLo have not skipped a beat after all of this time away from HnH. What a piss poor decision this addition is.
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
-
zacty
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:58 pm
- Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
how so?Sarge wrote:Nice to see JLo have not skipped a beat after all of this time away from HnH. What a piss poor decision this addition is.
i really need to find a good signature
-
KajetanChrumps
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 8:02 pm
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
A nice way to troll PKers.sabinati wrote:weight is int/2
Feed a fresh alt to say 30 Int, then let someone get it's skull. It is not so hard if you feed a 400LP miner with int food.
BTW it looks straight mining doesn't work as smooth as before.
-
cobaltjones
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:27 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
You literally know nothing about it you retard.Sarge wrote:Nice to see JLo have not skipped a beat after all of this time away from HnH. What a piss poor decision this addition is.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
Yooo, allrighty hold your horses man. Sarge is defintely not a retard and I can see where the concerns come from.
So why don't we keep it a little more civil?
Maybe everyone should wait till the first real results on these are in. I am sure bigger factions are already slaying armies of alts to exploit this so maybe they will deliver some results soon
So why don't we keep it a little more civil?
Maybe everyone should wait till the first real results on these are in. I am sure bigger factions are already slaying armies of alts to exploit this so maybe they will deliver some results soon
-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
Nah man, he's right, if it was anyone else that called me a retard I would have agreed with you, but everybody knows he's a genius.burgingham wrote:Yooo, allrighty hold your horses man. Sarge is defintely not a retard and I can see where the concerns come from.
So why don't we keep it a little more civil?
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
It encourages PK'ing.zacty wrote:how so?Sarge wrote:Nice to see JLo have not skipped a beat after all of this time away from HnH. What a piss poor decision this addition is.
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
not really. lowbie skulls will be worthless since the lp is 1% of the dead char's lp. chars with high lp (5m+) will be worth killing for their skull, but are also going to be harder to kill.
-
cobaltjones
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:27 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
How can you honestly say that without actually knowing anything about the curiosity stats?Sarge wrote:It encourages PK'ing.zacty wrote:how so?Sarge wrote:Nice to see JLo have not skipped a beat after all of this time away from HnH. What a piss poor decision this addition is.
That's like saying the inclusion of the LEATHER BALL encourages animal massacres.
-
Sarge
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:41 am
Re: NEW W7 CURIOS THREAD
1/100 of owner's LP and 1/2 owner's int for att.cobaltjones wrote: How can you honestly say that without actually knowing anything about the curiosity stats?
That's like saying the inclusion of the LEATHER BALL encourages animal massacres.
factnfiction101 wrote:^I agree with this guy.