History repeats itself. Change of leadership page 28

[Jackard]

page 10 snipe :woot:

If you were part of the raid, you would have found good stuff in Prip. Everything was made on-site, nothing stolen. We make good stuff.

You must be a moron. I have said that I was killed before that raid at least 4 times.

"would have" implies that it was hypothetical and he knows you were not

[niltrias]

Xanadu is a malevolent force that cannot be reasoned with, they strike as one with impunity

lol. Funny that. Xanadu strikes only in response to raids. Delamore is the one who strikes at will, and not with any impunity.

[Jaltos]

You must be a moron. I have said that I was killed before that raid at least 4 times.

I must be a moron, when you are talking about stuff you don't know? Just check my wording. I said "IF", as in "if you were there". I never said anything about you being there, did I?

And aren't you the one who keeps going back to "del attacked codexia, he said goons did it" after even he himself said it was for satire?

[Jaltos]

Xanadu is a malevolent force that cannot be reasoned with, they strike as one with impunity

lol. Funny that. Xanadu strikes only in response to raids. Delamore is the one who strikes at will, and not with any impunity.

Last time I checked, Prip raided no one. I want my cookie now.

[Jackard]

Xanadu is a malevolent force that cannot be reasoned with, they strike as one with impunity

lol. Funny that. Xanadu strikes only in response to raids.

obviously not, seeing as Prip was never party to any raids

[niltrias]

page 10 snipe :woot:

If you were part of the raid, you would have found good stuff in Prip. Everything was made on-site, nothing stolen. We make good stuff.

You must be a moron. I have said that I was killed before that raid at least 4 times.

"would have" implies that it was hypothetical and he knows you were not

A good point, but a fine one. Generally speaking, it was a comment on my comment, which implied that I was there.
I will grant you a touche on this one, although I dont think that you are representing what was meant.

[Agarrett]

I'm sad, see?

[Jackard]

I will grant you a touche on this one, although I dont think that you are representing what was meant.

viewtopic.php?p=41197#p41197

[Jaltos]

A good point, but a fine one. Generally speaking, it was a comment on my comment, which implied that I was there.
I will grant you a touche on this one, although I dont think that you are representing what was meant.

Again, you're implying stuff that isn't true. You said that Xanadu doesn't take our stuff because it's crap, but it's a misinformed opinion you got because Xanadu never brings anything back after raiding us. The reason they raid us is to kill as many people as possible and breaking the most shit as possible. Last time I checked, Goons never did that.

[niltrias]

obviously not, seeing as Prip was never party to any raids

Again, I know nothing about the Prip raid. I might have known something, but I was killed for killing someone in the process of raiding innsmouth.
So obviously, whoever killed me supported the raiding of an innocent town.
I was trying to stop someone from killing innocent people, you castigate me because you claim to have died innocent.
what was that word, again, Jackard?