Some useful quality benchmarks

hazzor · Post by **hazzor** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:00 pm

sayane wrote:
hazzor wrote:I've not done any real maths since college physics a year or so ago
ohmygod, college... what country? it`s primary school level where I am from
resulting quality will be q13. a+b+c+n*x is n times x added to the rest of them, (a+b+c+x)*n is what you assumed

sheesh, I was simply stating that it was the last time I did any real math rather than that was where I learnt it from, calm your tits

Seizure · Post by **Seizure** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:01 pm

Great, now I want to see what crazy tits look like

hazzor · Post by **hazzor** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:02 pm

Seizure wrote:Great, now I want to see what crazy tits look like

never stick your dick in crazy, no matter how good the tits...

sayane · Post by **sayane** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:43 pm

hazzor wrote:the last time I did any real math

It just got to me when you call that example "REAL" maths xD

hazzor · Post by **hazzor** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:19 pm

sayane wrote:
hazzor wrote:the last time I did any real math
It just got to me when you call that example "REAL" maths xD

as far as I'm concerned anything that requires more mental work than addition or multiplication is "real", I studied physics but not further maths or stats

dageir · Post by **dageir** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:25 pm

hazzor wrote:
sayane wrote:
hazzor wrote:the last time I did any real math
It just got to me when you call that example "REAL" maths xD
as far as I'm concerned anything that requires more mental work than addition or multiplication is "real", I studied physics but not further maths or stats

Like division?

Post by **sabinati** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:25 pm

hazzor wrote:
NOOBY93 wrote:"Assuming all animals are level 10"
correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never seen a lvl 10 fox.
hence "assuming"

but why are you assuming all animals are level X when most aren't? max fox is IV, boar is VII, troll is V.

NOOBY93 · Post by **NOOBY93** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:29 pm

sabinati wrote:
hazzor wrote:
NOOBY93 wrote:"Assuming all animals are level 10"
correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never seen a lvl 10 fox.
hence "assuming"
but why are you assuming all animals are level X when most aren't? max fox is IV, boar is VII, troll is V.

Probably so you could calculate what Q an animal will be when you attack it and know it's level.
I think he just used X as an example.

krikke93 · Post by **krikke93** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:32 pm

It's stupid animals have fixed levels. I remember when this wasn't the case.

NOOBY93 · Post by **NOOBY93** » Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:44 pm

krikke93 wrote:It's stupid animals have fixed levels. I remember when this wasn't the case.

They don't have fixed levels.
if they are close to a village claim they will have a smaller level.

Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks

Re: Some useful quality benchmarks