The e-mails I get...

[dagrimreefah]

EDIT: Arguing, then, that it is "mere political correctness" to have to refrain from using "nigger" in that context is not at all trying to "deflect blame" for insulting people; everyone knows that it was an insult and intended as such, and noone is even trying to deny that. It's just pointing out that banning that word has nothing to do with the use of the word to insult niggers for being niggers, but merely as a silly and pointless ban of the word itself, isolated from any of its possible meanings (because one of its uses is a thoughtcrime which must be prevented from being even conceived).

Thank you.

shut up faggots

No you, nigger.

[loftar]

shut up faggots

Behold, indeed, another example where the use of "faggot" is not actually used to insult homosexuals for being homosexuals.

If anyone wanted to complain that the comment is immature or uncalled for, I would not necessarily disagree, but if you come ranting about kLauE enforcing his cis-privileges and the patriarchy's rape-culture, I might consider having yo ass for it.

On the third hand, it can perfectly well also be argued that being all butthurt about seeing "faggot" being used on the Internet is just as (if not more) immature as using it, and that one should be trolled a bit into a state of lesser sensitivity. The balance is not always obvious, and I don't think there's any example solution to every conflict related thereto.

[dagrimreefah]

I really truly believe there is some subliminal, offensive psychological impact on people when they hear or see any 6 letter word with 2 'G's in the middle.

[saltmummy626]

something along the lines of intent, not definition. george carlin went into this profoundly in his acts a few times. something like "There are no bad words. just bad thoughts, bad intentions, and words. " Louis CK said something along the lines of "Just because a guy is a faggot, doesn't mean he is a homosexual. it just means he is a faggot." It just depends on how its used. I guess it just depends on who you talk to. words is words.

[loftar]

I guess it just depends on who you talk to.

That's "whom" to you, you illiterate dyslexic. ¦]

[NOOBY93]

I guess it just depends on who you talk to.

That's "whom" to you, you illiterate dyslexic.

Isn't that disgraphic?

[jordancoles]

I really truly believe there is some subliminal, offensive psychological impact on people when they hear or see any 6 letter word with 2 'G's in the middle.

Fucking nagger

[cobaltjones]

shut up faggots

Behold, indeed, another example where the use of "faggot" is not actually used to insult homosexuals for being homosexuals.

If you can't see how the use of the word faggot can be viewed as offensive to homosexuals, regardless of the intent of the use or even if the word isn't directed at them, then I don't really know what to tell you.

"Oh, I'm not calling him gay! I'm just using an inflamatory word used to describe homosexuals as an insult against him because I hate him! I don't have an actual problem with gay people, I'm just calling him gay because I hate him!"

[jordancoles]

shut up faggots

Behold, indeed, another example where the use of "faggot" is not actually used to insult homosexuals for being homosexuals.

If you can't see how the use of the word faggot can be viewed as offensive to homosexuals, regardless of the intent of the use or even if the word isn't directed at them, then I don't really know what to tell you.

"Oh, I'm not calling him gay! I'm just using an inflamatory word used to describe homosexuals as an insult against him because I hate him! I don't have an actual problem with gay people, I'm just calling him gay because I hate him!"

Being called homosexual when you are indeed straight is a very effective insult. It's the same as being called autistic or "different" in any way from what you actually are.

[loftar]

If you can't see how the use of the word faggot can be viewed as offensive to homosexuals

Of course I can see how it can (it is even what I argued for in previous posts), but how is that relevant?

"Oh, I'm not calling him gay! I'm just using an inflamatory word used to describe homosexuals as an insult against him because I hate him! I don't have an actual problem with gay people, I'm just calling him gay because I hate him!"

This is, arguably, precisely what happened. What is your point?