No, the OP agrees with the guy who actually bothered to explain a bit to get the point across :p
..er, he did.. trav edited his post >_>
-
Sever
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:38 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Slow hunger
This thread is messed up, what with the edits.
It doesn't make sense to need to eat 50 apples between starving and full. Other than making people click more, what's the reason for fruit reducing hunger by so little? Giving them an incentive to eat something else? It doesn't make sense to have to eat ten loaves of bread, either. I don't want to argue for FEP foods taking away more hunger, because that's just more plow/water, but it doesn't matter for 0 FEP food.
It doesn't make sense to need to eat 50 apples between starving and full. Other than making people click more, what's the reason for fruit reducing hunger by so little? Giving them an incentive to eat something else? It doesn't make sense to have to eat ten loaves of bread, either. I don't want to argue for FEP foods taking away more hunger, because that's just more plow/water, but it doesn't matter for 0 FEP food.
Come back two hours earlier.
-
Jackard
- Posts: 8849
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
- Location: fucking curios how do they work
Re: Slow hunger
devs are already planning to rework hunger
what a pointless thread
what a pointless thread
-
Agarrett
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:37 pm
- Location: East of Nowhere
-
Sever
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:38 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Slow hunger
In the line of mini-features and stealth updates, increasing the hunger restored by fruit would not be unusual or pointless. It might be undesirable, but if it is I don't see why.
Come back two hours earlier.
-
theTrav
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: Slow hunger
again agreed. even without a full re-work, making apples sustain you for longer would take a lot of the pain off new players.Sever wrote:In the line of mini-features and stealth updates, increasing the hunger restored by fruit would not be unusual or pointless. It might be undesirable, but if it is I don't see why.
Last I heard though they were concerned about the impact on the economy (parhaps there's people out there buying food from vending stalls just for sustenance rather than for FEP)
-
Avu
- Posts: 3000
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: Slow hunger
Yes because people that are in dire need of sustenance have lots of coins.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
-
Fluffy
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:16 am
Re: Slow hunger
Plus if you're like me and have Satellite Internet, having to wait a few seconds between your clicks is hell for picking & eating a shitload of apples. It would help a lot there.theTrav wrote:making apples sustain you for longer would take a lot of the pain off new players.
Your ad here
-
Flame
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:03 pm
Re: Slow hunger
I was almost opening a thread with the same question.
Please, slow down the hungry.
In a real day, we have hungry 4 time. OOK! So is ok that my charachter become hungry.
But, to be full, we DON'T need ten or more beef. Can you imagine how much are, ten beef?
If don't want to slow the hungry, make the food point better. One beef should give really a lot more than now. I, usually, don't eat a tons of meat to be full...are ok one, or two. if i have only those, then ok, three. But TEN...just Obelix, i suppose..XD
Actually the things are wrong. Or the food or the hungry speed. I suggest to look for the food, probably it give really few.
(I'm not english, so don't kill me XD)
Please, slow down the hungry.
In a real day, we have hungry 4 time. OOK! So is ok that my charachter become hungry.
But, to be full, we DON'T need ten or more beef. Can you imagine how much are, ten beef?
If don't want to slow the hungry, make the food point better. One beef should give really a lot more than now. I, usually, don't eat a tons of meat to be full...are ok one, or two. if i have only those, then ok, three. But TEN...just Obelix, i suppose..XD
Actually the things are wrong. Or the food or the hungry speed. I suggest to look for the food, probably it give really few.
(I'm not english, so don't kill me XD)
-
Chakravanti
- Posts: 3345
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am
Re: Slow hunger
You should know better by now.Agarrett wrote:Jackard, do you ever have anything actually positive to say?
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!