A Plea for Moderation

[Jackard]

These forums were more entertaining when you guys didn't censor shit unless it was spam. Have you read the quality of posts and posters lately? And you delete the posts that, while flaming, are at least well written and, to a degree, funny? That is some pathetic moderation.

Sign of the times (and active moderators)

[Arcan2]

http://weknowmemes.com/2013/09/unnecess ... ip-7-gifs/

wow tecknight. A little trigger happy tonight are we?

[TeckXKnight]

Cool story. If you're going to post pictures that appear to be beastialty or what have you know that they violate rules on 1) posting illegal stuff and 2) posting pornography.

"4. Inappropriate Content
No excessive swearing, posting malicious links or disturbing images. That includes NSFW images."

[Arcan2]

unnecessary-censorship

didn't know that a dog licking a phone (or other black object) was nsfw
But whatever, see you in a week. I'll be sure to post something extra special for you teck

[TeckXKnight]

A disturbing image was posted and removed by a mod, me in this instance. In response you post another disturbing image that purposefully looks like a dog fellating a dude as if this is somehow appropriate. You can play cute and try to skirt whatever line you want, but those kinds of images are highly inappropriate here. If you wish to push the issue the result will be the same and I hope that you don't.

[Sarge]

...If you wish to push the issue the result will be the same...

I certainly hope not. Doing it again after he has clearly been warned, does not warrant the same level of punishment. If he, or anyone else for that matter, insist on being an ass, then they should get what they deserve.

[Amanda44]

...If you wish to push the issue the result will be the same...but for longer.

I certainly hope not. Doing it again after he has clearly been warned, does not warrant the same level of punishment. If he, or anyone else for that matter, insist on being an ass, then they should get what they deserve.

+1

And a +1 for Teck! You tell him Teck -

[ramones]

Is really that gif considered that much offensive? Personally i find a lot of pictures on forum much much more disturbing that this censored one which I found it as a funny joke (though it could be put up in other context, didn't see the post itself).

On other hand I agree there shouldn't be such harsh reactions, they're never good.

[jordancoles]

Is really that gif considered that much offensive? Personally i find a lot of pictures on forum much much more disturbing that this censored one which I found it as a funny joke (though it could be put up in other context, didn't see the post itself).

On other hand I agree there shouldn't be such harsh reactions, they're never good.

The original .gif was fairly convincing. It really did LOOK like beastiality. And if your employer were to walk behind you and see it there is absolutely no doubt that they would think that it was. No NSFW tag, the .gif was also a reply to a moderator's actions. Yep, just a bad idea all around.

[ramones]

Ah ok, just checked the link I saw where it was censored thing, so it wasn't anything speciall (among with all other similar ones censored too). Guess if original was worse, bad move then.