Smacks of an exploit to me

[Chakravanti]

It's cheap.

[stickman]

im curious. is the complaint that it impossible to get to that house without breaking down like 50 brick walls? or is there some other abuse in this picture i cannot see

[Jackard]

umm can someone explain what the exploit is? all i see are brickwalls next to a cliff?

[burgingham]

It is kinda the point. Inside the cabin are heartfires, so if someone wants to summon us they have to break the wall first.


Jackard, the clue is the walls are in between two cliffs, so you cannot reach the cabin without breaking the walls.

[warrri]

What people might consider as an exploit here is that it only took 6 Cornerposts altogether instead of 5 or 6 per layer + a gate for each layer.

[Jackard]

Jackard, the clue is the walls are in between two cliffs, so you cannot reach the cabin without breaking the walls.

yea so? sucks to be a crusader

[DeadlyPencil]

well if a couple people did go over there to kill them, i am sure it would take forever but couldn't they just take the place for themselves after the deed? and rebuld the wall to block it off again? or does the claim stop you from doing stuff?

[warrri]

They could, but they cant destroy the signposts so we could get inside without bashing the walls

[Delamore]

Are you trying to say that double stacking cabins can produce the same result? you know what also produces the same result? cabins all around instead.
In short this thread is retarded and Loftar still owes me areas with 3 natural walls from last map.

[Chakravanti]

They could, but they cant destroy the signposts so we could get inside without bashing the walls

Acutally yes, they can destroy the signpost. What they cannot do is hearth a chief alt inside that can summon players inside after the walls are finished. Besides, It would be far cheaper to do it with cabins and more effective because you coudl run the wall more than a mere 16 tiles.