No, I haven't read any.vatas wrote: Can you link any good "writing java for dummies" -tutorials?
http://stackoverflow.com/ is a good source for Q and A though.
No, I haven't read any.vatas wrote: Can you link any good "writing java for dummies" -tutorials?
Brás wrote: Anyway, I can see you're mostly interested on posting images than actually discussing anything. Have "fun", I'm done here.

Seriously, that was really... REALLY... dumb. HOW IN THE WORLD ARE THESE TWO SCENARIOS RELATABLE IN THE LEAST? First of all, you used the word STOP. "How can law enforcement STOP people from speeding?" The use of the word STOP is already incorrect in relation to what is actually being discussed. No one is saying it's possible to STOP botting completely, just the same as it is not possible to stop speeding completely. However, that is why speeding laws exist in the first place. We all realize that there are people who speed dangerously when they should not be, and these laws exist in the hopes that one will take in to consideration the lives of others before they exercise their poor judgment.DemoGraFX wrote:the stupidest analogy I have ever read in my lifetime
Who are you to say what the sole issue is? I disagree wholeheartedly that the combatting of bots isn't just as important, if not more.DemoGraFX wrote:Well, the issue in all of the botter threads is not the combatting of the bots, but the unfair advantage that the bots give.
If you could hypothetically stop multi-clienting, you could stop people from running numerous bots simultaneously to do everything for them from collecting pearls over and over, to washing their pants. I know how ridiculous this is, as when I actively played I would generally run 5-10 clients simultaneously. I know people that would run 18+. I am sure there are crazies out there that run even more.Kaios wrote: As for Robben and Bras, you're trying to argue the multi-clienting issue rather than botting it seems to me. The two are related, of course, but I don't see how arguing about whether or not the alt accounts are preventable is as pertinent as the botting itself.
#swagI agree, which is why I'm so adamant about the botting issues instead. I see less of a problem with alt accounts on their own than in combination with the use of bots. It doesn't really matter how many times someone says to me specifically or just as a general statement, "There's no way to prevent botting 100%, it is here to stay, get used to it, learn to program/script, blah blah motherfucking blah."Robben_DuMarsch wrote: If you could hypothetically stop multi-clienting, you could stop people from running numerous bots simultaneously to do everything for them from collecting pearls over and over, to washing their pants. I know how ridiculous this is, as when I actively played I would generally run 5-10 clients simultaneously. I know people that would run 18+. I am sure there are crazies out there that run even more.
But you can't effectively combat multi-clienting without empowering the few that know how to circumvent blocks, so the point is moot.
Exactly. People play the game how they want to, it's not affecting you and your spruce cap (except for some forraging bots maybe) so what's the problem?Kaios wrote: It's the players who want the bots, not the game forcing you to use them.
What makes you think the present bots won't work for hafen?windmaker wrote: @arcanust join to me and we can make a new bot engine for hafen, we can make mad to a lot of people here, because the present bots dont work in hafen