Construction Decay

[Onionfighter]

I'm tired of seeing bear traps in the middle of nowhere.

[sabinati]

yeah, maybe constuction signs should have the same decay rate as the item being constructed

[Chakravanti]

No. Seriously. You haven't built a brick wall and stored a fuckton of bricks.

[Onionfighter]

No. Seriously. You haven't built a brick wall and stored a fuckton of bricks.

Yes I have. If you wish to preserve the storage option, this could easily be done in other ways (construction of wood/brick piles, etc.)

[Lightning2]

No. Seriously. You haven't built a brick wall and stored a fuckton of bricks.

Yes I have. If you wish to preserve the storage option, this could easily be done in other ways (construction of wood/brick piles, etc.)

But we don't have wood/brick piles.

[Chakravanti]

Yeah sure, Make those before this then I support. We get enough backasswards shit as it is.

[Kahim]

A pile of logs or boards. bricks yea ill support it but seriously before you make the signs decayable. cause making mas of anything is killer

[Machenoid]

Base the decay rate off of how many items are inside of it. 1/10/0 fence bear-traps will decay faster then the 1/10/9 presumably-legitimately-built fences. then possibly also put in a limit to when the decay will happen based on what object it is; a 1% complete palisade will decay faster then a 50% palisade, and the 90% palisade won't decay at all; meanwhile if you applied those same % completion to something like a wooden fence, it would always construction-decay no matter the %, because it's just a wooden fence (meanwhile brick walls would stop decaying at 50% complete, and cabins at 20% complete, and village totems not at all, ever. etc)
obviously once construction is finished, the pre-built decay is removed.

* all figures given are examples