https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9C9OKMyZngwindmaker wrote:fix'dMetruption wrote:How big is your gay porn collectionloftar wrote:
- 7 TB RAID1 storage
- Fuck optical drives ^^
pls loftar, no ban
-
Metruption
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:26 am
Re: SPECCY THREAD
-
Ninijutsu
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 4:22 am
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Have my babies.loftar wrote: [*]GeForce 560, dual 4:3 monitors
[*]GeForce 630 (rev. 2), retarded 16:9 monitor (y'all who use this willingly should kill yourselves)[/list]
Of another era.
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Why would you do this? I could understand it if you were trying to build a very cheap computer, but that doesn't seem to have been your goal. Since Core, Intel is just so superior it's not even funny.[/quote]painhertz wrote:>amd fx cpu
I didn't build it, it was built by a soldier based in Korea who ran a custom gaming rig company in his spare time. Sure Core's are better but my entire rig is so insanely powerful that the chances of even 50% of the resources being used by any game in the next 10 years are slim to none. So really? what's the point in the difference from AMD and Intel?
Also: As someone pointed out, check that temp. show me a Core pulling that off.....
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: SPECCY THREAD
I mostly just wanted to know why rather than make fun of you, but now you're just begging for it. Bulldozer was pretty much AMD's equivalent of Intel's Netburst; 2-wide int issue, shared decoders and L1I, long pipelines, no store-forwarding, no speculative loading, sub-par branch prediction and poor turbo-clocking. Sure, if you find some programs that makes truly judicious use of all 8 cores (ie. not a game) it might not be ridiculously far behind the Cores, but in single-threaded performance even Pentiums are beating it. And that's not even mentioning the shared FP logic. The K10 was a better microarchitecture. I used to be an AMD fanboy only 7 years ago and it really pains me to see them put out these hapless processors, but I can't stay blind forever. When we switched the Haven server from AMD to Intel it was like a 3-times speedup at the same clockspeed.painhertz wrote:Sure Core's are better but my entire rig is so insanely powerful that the chances of even 50% of the resources being used by any game
Fortunately, AMD's latest CEO changeup seems somewhat optimistic and they seem to have gotten some of their better engineers back, and I'm holding some hope for the K12.
>FX-8120 TDP: 125Wpainhertz wrote:Also: As someone pointed out, check that temp. show me a Core pulling that off.....
>Core i7 4790K: 88W
CPU temperature measurements are known to be flaky sometimes; I know what I'm placing my bet on. For the record, one of my previous AMD CPUs used to record negative temperatures.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
RustyBuckitt
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:09 am
- Location: The "Bud" with "a friend"
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Is there Anyone, on this entire forum, that has a DDR4 rig?
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Jorb does. :)RustyBuckitt wrote:Is there Anyone, on this entire forum, that has a DDR4 rig?
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Maybe it was breaking the Third Law of Thermodynamics.loftar wrote:I mostly just wanted to know why rather than make fun of you, but now you're just begging for it. Bulldozer was pretty much AMD's equivalent of Intel's Netburst; 2-wide int issue, shared decoders and L1I, long pipelines, no store-forwarding, no speculative loading, sub-par branch prediction and poor turbo-clocking. Sure, if you find some programs that makes truly judicious use of all 8 cores (ie. not a game) it might not be ridiculously far behind the Cores, but in single-threaded performance even Celerons are beating it. And that's not even mentioning the shared FP logic. The K10 was a better microarchitecture. I used to be an AMD fanboy only 7 years ago and it really pains me to see them put out these hapless processors, but I can't stay blind forever. When we switched the Haven server from AMD to Intel it was like a 3-times speedup at the same clockspeed.painhertz wrote:Sure Core's are better but my entire rig is so insanely powerful that the chances of even 50% of the resources being used by any game
Fortunately, AMD's latest CEO changeup seems somewhat optimistic and they seem to have gotten some of their better engineers back, and I'm holding some hope for the K12.
>FX-8120 TDP: 125Wpainhertz wrote:Also: As someone pointed out, check that temp. show me a Core pulling that off.....
>Core i7 4790K: 88W
CPU temperature measurements are known to be flaky sometimes; I know what I'm placing my bet on. For the record, one of my previous AMD CPUs used to record negative temperatures.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lezcxWzCl2E
Last edited by painhertz on Wed Feb 18, 2015 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
RustyBuckitt
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:09 am
- Location: The "Bud" with "a friend"
Re: SPECCY THREAD
loftar wrote:Jorb does.RustyBuckitt wrote:Is there Anyone, on this entire forum, that has a DDR4 rig?
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: SPECCY THREAD
Check out this little booger..... I have about 8 of them, love tinkering with them.

http://www.cnet.com/products/dell-optip ... ies/specs/

http://www.cnet.com/products/dell-optip ... ies/specs/
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
overtyped
- Posts: 3906
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
- Location: Quaran book burning festival
Re: SPECCY THREAD
I talked to him, but he isn't sure what kind of timber my apple is made ofMetruption wrote:viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29715overtyped wrote:I just bought the latest apple model, as usual they are ahead of the curve, and their computers aren't inferior to pc in any noticable way.
However, it doesn't appear to be working like my old pc. Does anyone know a good carpenter?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Early world exploit: Put your hearthfire inside a cave, then hold shift to position a claim right in front of a cave. After 8 hours the claim will be unbreakable. Since your hearthfire is inside the cave, you can still get back inside, and leave, but nobody will be able to enter, effectively making you unraidable for the first 3-7 days. Enjoy
