Did you not watch the video in the very first post?txtrung0 wrote:For all the good mentioned (project zomboid style house, Wurmonline style mine)
Start making the world 3D guys. Even if it's fake (layered 2d) it'll still be good enough.
-
TeckXKnight
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
- Location: How Do I?
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
-
txtrung0
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:19 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Huh? Am I mising something?TeckXKnight wrote:Did you not watch the video in the very first post?txtrung0 wrote:For all the good mentioned (project zomboid style house, Wurmonline style mine)
Start making the world 3D guys. Even if it's fake (layered 2d) it'll still be good enough.
-
TeckXKnight
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
- Location: How Do I?
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
The world is 3D. Not only are the animations 3D but we see loftar jump off of a cliff, implying height. I don't believe that it's true 3D, rather layered 2.5D, but you said that would also qualify.
-
txtrung0
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:19 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
I didn't notice thatTeckXKnight wrote:The world is 3D. Not only are the animations 3D but we see loftar jump off of a cliff, implying height. I don't believe that it's true 3D, rather layered 2.5D, but you said that would also qualify.
I do hope that as you said, it is actually at least layered, not just a terrain-passing animation.
-
LadyV
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:34 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Cellars should be their own pocket area. Otherwise we create a situation I dont think anyone would like. Every faction, hermit, or small group would be subject to sapping and tunneling regardless of defence at any time. It does not create fun only irritation.Kaios wrote: I can see how there would be many issues they'd have to tackle before actually getting around to an entirely persistent world in one "realm" though. Such as what might happen with cellars; Would they work the same way but just lead down one level in to the mines? If there's a cavern below do you just create access in to and out from some random cave? Maybe the cellars themselves would still have to be their own pocket universe. Solutions for stuff like that would need to be figured out first.
-
mvgulik
- Posts: 4094
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 2:29 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
No pocket universes: Don't that also means,
- Space inside a house can only be the same as the house size on the outside.
- None 90" house rotation, or general off grid placement, would be ... kinda tricky.
...
I'm probably a little to much minecraft/lego minded here.
- Space inside a house can only be the same as the house size on the outside.
- None 90" house rotation, or general off grid placement, would be ... kinda tricky.
...
I'm probably a little to much minecraft/lego minded here.
Last edited by mvgulik on Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
I don't think that has to necessarily be the case. You work under the assumption that cellar level = mining level.LadyV wrote:Cellars should be their own pocket area. Otherwise we create a situation I dont think anyone would like. Every faction, hermit, or small group would be subject to sapping and tunneling regardless of defence at any time. It does not create fun only irritation.Kaios wrote: I can see how there would be many issues they'd have to tackle before actually getting around to an entirely persistent world in one "realm" though. Such as what might happen with cellars; Would they work the same way but just lead down one level in to the mines? If there's a cavern below do you just create access in to and out from some random cave? Maybe the cellars themselves would still have to be their own pocket universe. Solutions for stuff like that would need to be figured out first.
-
LadyV
- Posts: 3113
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:34 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Maybe that's a solution but it's still a pocket layer.burgingham wrote: I don't think that has to necessarily be the case. You work under the assumption that cellar level = mining level.
If people want connected cellars like one of the previous posts asks it can only be done by a separate pocket/layer and then only by the claim owner. Otherwise you have to create a whole new area of security. As i mentioned it would only take someone building a nearby cabin and digging a cellar to then dig into yours. Cellars must be independent of others attempts to mine in. It would be unreasonable to expect to defend against that without huge changes to the game.
-
Matheusmk
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:17 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
The ground leveling sucks.
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Could also just make cellar walls impenetrable from the outside and do not allow any digging of exits to the surface or whatever.Well designed tunneling into enemy towns does sound tempting, probably not managable without being too strong though...LadyV wrote:Maybe that's a solution but it's still a pocket layer.burgingham wrote: I don't think that has to necessarily be the case. You work under the assumption that cellar level = mining level.
If people want connected cellars like one of the previous posts asks it can only be done by a separate pocket/layer and then only by the claim owner. Otherwise you have to create a whole new area of security. As i mentioned it would only take someone building a nearby cabin and digging a cellar to then dig into yours. Cellars must be independent of others attempts to mine in. It would be unreasonable to expect to defend against that without huge changes to the game.
Edit: Actually my first suggestion probably still does not allow what was asked for. Maybe connecting cellars is just not a viable option then. I don't think it adds that much to the game anyway.