Salem release

burgingham · Post by **burgingham** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:54 am

Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.

MarpTarpton · Post by **MarpTarpton** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:57 am

burgingham wrote:Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.

Thank you for understanding.

Claeyt · Post by **Claeyt** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:00 am

MarpTarpton wrote:
burgingham wrote:You forgot to mention the awesome feature of developers randomly killing off players when they are bored.
I'd just like to point out that this barely ever happens.

Also, Claeyt, VQ #27 is complete. Please come back to the Salem forums for more information on VQ #28.

falconsadist · Post by **falconsadist** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:03 am

txtrung0 wrote:
Jackard wrote:
burgingham wrote:You forgot to mention the awesome feature of developers randomly killing off players when they are bored.
Tell me some more...
http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic ... t=MM+tribe

Yes, that terrible day when the Chief/JC killed his alts and shut down his own faction.

Claeyt · Post by **Claeyt** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 6:21 am

burgingham wrote:Oh, excuse me. If they only kill players for no reason every now and then it is of course totally fine and they deserve a medal for holding back their urges.

Again, I don't think they've ever actually killed a player as Dev's.

MarpTarpton wrote:Thank you for understanding.

Although, We never did get that whole story Marp. Did you kill <The Russian> and then <Player 1> using dev powers so as to change the political landscape of Salem?

You're in a safe place here, you can whisper it to us. We'll never tell.

jorb · Post by **jorb** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:28 am

Claeyt wrote:I'd say it's more like we have a general trolling argument with each other randomly and he makes a lot better latte than the last barista who was a strange little lazy hairy swedish guy who spouted weird stuff about the Masons and the NSA.

Ah, I thought I smelled the foul reek of Claegue all over my pristine forums.

You, sir, can go somplace else and run your filthy little commie mouth.

Claeyt banned for being Claeyt. No one should infer anything about any sort of general forum rule from his sad example.

He's an edge case.

MarpTarpton · Post by **MarpTarpton** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:51 am

jorb wrote: Claeyt banned for being Claeyt. No one should infer anything about any sort of general forum rule from his sad example.

Claeyt's VQ #28 completed.

Jorb VQ# 12 completed.

What a productive day.

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST

txtrung0 · Post by **txtrung0** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:27 pm

Claeyt? Marp? Answer me! Nooooo....
Guess it's up to me to keep our pride up

loftar · Post by **loftar** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:32 pm

txtrung0 wrote:Guess it's up to me to keep our pride up

Please do, but I think it's for the best not to have the Claegue spreading corruption through that pride anyway. :)

Avu · Post by **Avu** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 4:02 pm

Nobody (or hardly nobody) is claiming salem is bad because it's a bad game it's bad because one of the devs is unprofessional.

btw marp is one of the devs; well if it's really him, he's not the unprofessional one from what I can tell but hey guilt by association.

Salem release

Re: Salem release

Re: Salem release

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Re: Salem release

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, III

Re: Salem release

Re: Salem release

Re: Salem release