-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Considering this seems to be the same guy I'd say he is quite young...
-
NaoWhut
- Posts: 4852
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
- Location: |.
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
What was the name of that one guyburgingham wrote:Considering this seems to be the same guy I'd say he is quite young...
every early world that tried to make
friends and failed, got murdered a
whole lot, kept giving out his HS,
and then turned around trying to say
they were trollin the whole time?


-
mvgulik
- Posts: 4094
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 2:29 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
After seeing what you generally write when things don't go your way, ... Good.YarPirate wrote:So I guess I'll just not come back to the forums.
Bye bye.
Suggest you try to stop talking about yourself. It would make a real difference. (And go back to school. A better one this time.)YarPirate wrote:People can't converse without being condescending like prissy bitch women than I will not bother.
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
-
dafels
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:49 pm
- Yahoo Messenger: davis
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
I'm curios what is loftar going to do to prevent botting or atleast make it ineffective.
Or they want haven 2 to be an another botfest? Would not be surprised....
Or they want haven 2 to be an another botfest? Would not be surprised....
Click to read Developer's thoughts on PvP
-
windmaker
- Posts: 1855
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:08 am
- Location: in the forum where some mods are fags.
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
If something can be bottable.. gonna be bottabledafels wrote:I'm curios what is loftar going to do to prevent botting or atleast make it ineffective.
Or they want haven 2 to be an another botfest? Would not be surprised....
#swag-
dafels
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:49 pm
- Yahoo Messenger: davis
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
The ones with the first botting client and scripts wins the game as usual I guess...
Click to read Developer's thoughts on PvP
-
NaoWhut
- Posts: 4852
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
- Location: |.
-
Bob_the_Cat
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:45 am
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Theres things like automated farming and stuff at least. At least give them a little credit for trying. The only way to remove botting curios is to remove lp... And that probobly wouldn't work well. Or at least limit your curios you can use per day, but then people would just make alt armies and so the botting would continue...dafels wrote:The ones with the first botting client and scripts wins the game as usual I guess...
-
dafels
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:49 pm
- Yahoo Messenger: davis
Re: The Ghost of Christmas Future, II
Another solution might be that it's somehow restricted client-wise, like it wouldn't allow clicks made by the client (not by an actual person) to be sent to the server or whatever, this is just an example, I know it wouldn't work this easy. I believe it can be done client or server wise without removing systems as curios or whatever. It would be very dissapointing if loftar wouldn't do anything against botting.Bob_the_Cat wrote:Theres things like automated farming and stuff at least. At least give them a little credit for trying. The only way to remove botting curios is to remove lp... And that probobly wouldn't work well. Or at least limit your curios you can use per day, but then people would just make alt armies and so the botting would continue...dafels wrote:The ones with the first botting client and scripts wins the game as usual I guess...
Click to read Developer's thoughts on PvP
