-
Kheyre
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
Because its rng, you are not guaranteed new berries. Imo its a bad system, it should be timer related. That is why spawn is so barren of shit, cause everyone takes crap and it never comes back.
-
overtyped
- Posts: 3906
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
- Location: Quaran book burning festival
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
none is taking anything from them, and if you read what i wrote, the wild ones are consistantly giving berries.Kheyre wrote:Because its rng, you are not guaranteed new berries. Imo its a bad system, it should be timer related. That is why spawn is so barren of shit, cause everyone takes crap and it never comes back.
If not 1 berry in 108 bushes after 5 days, there has to be something going on.
Edit: could it be because I leveled the soil, that it's stopping the ticking?
Early world exploit: Put your hearthfire inside a cave, then hold shift to position a claim right in front of a cave. After 8 hours the claim will be unbreakable. Since your hearthfire is inside the cave, you can still get back inside, and leave, but nobody will be able to enter, effectively making you unraidable for the first 3-7 days. Enjoy
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
Could be that they're on a claim stopping the decay process. From this end, who can say if it is actually a bug or just bad RNG. More time and testing needed maybe, I think.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
overtyped
- Posts: 3906
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
- Location: Quaran book burning festival
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
It isn't on a claim, so that can't be it. They are locked up though.MagicManICT wrote:Could be that they're on a claim stopping the decay process. From this end, who can say if it is actually a bug or just bad RNG. More time and testing needed maybe, I think.
Early world exploit: Put your hearthfire inside a cave, then hold shift to position a claim right in front of a cave. After 8 hours the claim will be unbreakable. Since your hearthfire is inside the cave, you can still get back inside, and leave, but nobody will be able to enter, effectively making you unraidable for the first 3-7 days. Enjoy
-
jorb
- Posts: 18715
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
- Location: Here, there and everywhere.
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
I'll investigate a bit, but I suspect it's working as intended.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-
overtyped
- Posts: 3906
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
- Location: Quaran book burning festival
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
2/108 just gave me berries today. It was real strange not to get a single one for 5 days though.
Early world exploit: Put your hearthfire inside a cave, then hold shift to position a claim right in front of a cave. After 8 hours the claim will be unbreakable. Since your hearthfire is inside the cave, you can still get back inside, and leave, but nobody will be able to enter, effectively making you unraidable for the first 3-7 days. Enjoy
-
jorb
- Posts: 18715
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
- Location: Here, there and everywhere.
Re: berry bush bug? (update)
Investigated this a bit. Working as intended. Locking.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-
Granger
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm
Re: berry bush bug?
Having a toon logged in in the area 24/7 (which is what will happen for every tree/bush-farm in case it stays that way) is more resource intensive than adding a timestamp to the map tile. In case he saves the map tiles as single files they should already be timestamped anyway by the filesystem.jorb wrote:Loftar tells me that's to resource intensive. I have pushed for it several times.
So I call bullshit on that (sorry loftar).
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020