What is the worst curio?

Sever · Post by **Sever** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:56 pm

If the List of Curiosities thread is correct:

Lady's mantle: 60 LP/h (300/5)
Uncommon snapdragon: 66 LP/h (1000/15)
Thorny thistle: 23 LP/h (555/24)

I threw a few thorny thistles away after the one I was studying took hours and wasn't even 10%. It's not bad on mental weight but that doesnt help it any.

proknah · Post by **proknah** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:26 pm

Strange crystal is the worst. It requires 20(!) attention, takes days to study and probably is fate-type. It screws me so bad (since I'm a miner) that I never found any foragable fate curio so far.

Garfy · Post by **Garfy** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:40 pm

proknah wrote:Strange crystal is the worst. It requires 20(!) attention, takes days to study and probably is fate-type. It screws me so bad (since I'm a miner) that I never found any foragable fate curio so far.

It's not a fate type curio. I've found millions of them, and threw away just as many.

felipeaom · Post by **felipeaom** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:43 pm

proknah wrote:Strange crystal is the worst. It requires 20(!) attention, takes days to study and probably is fate-type. It screws me so bad (since I'm a miner) that I never found any foragable fate curio so far.

Almost sure Strange Crystal weights 12. Still pretty bad, though.

Uncommon Snapdragon and Thorny Thistle are not bad at all, they are average I think. Snapdragon takes like 8h and 4 mental weight for 1k lp at q10. Thorny Thistle is like 550lp/6h/2mw, so it is a bit worse. I think slots matter more in this new version of the game, so they feel worse than their previous version imo.

Sevenless · Post by **Sevenless** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:44 pm

I've always benchmarked "average" curios at 100 lp/hour/slot by the time I hit midgame. Anything above I'm happy to run, anything below I get meh on.

banok · Post by **banok** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:50 pm

surely like deer antlers are worse than mantles @22 attention

stalagooms feel really shitty to me.

felipeaom · Post by **felipeaom** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:10 pm

Sevenless wrote:I've always benchmarked "average" curios at 100 lp/hour/slot by the time I hit midgame. Anything above I'm happy to run, anything below I get meh on.

That's a fair average for old haven, but I think we got to lower our standards for average a bit for this new version.

Sevenless · Post by **Sevenless** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:22 pm

I'm not so certain on that. I think qualities are lower than legacy, not to mention the lack of 360%. That makes everything *feel* slow, but I've noticed a lot of attainable curios sitting in the 100-200LP/hour/slot range still.

felipeaom · Post by **felipeaom** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:58 pm

The lack of the 360% is killing me D:

Sever · Post by **Sever** » Wed Sep 23, 2015 10:06 pm

felipeaom wrote:Uncommon Snapdragon and Thorny Thistle are not bad at all, they are average I think. Snapdragon takes like 8h and 4 mental weight for 1k lp at q10. Thorny Thistle is like 550lp/6h/2mw, so it is a bit worse. I think slots matter more in this new version of the game, so they feel worse than their previous version imo.

If you are correct, then they're not too bad, but please see viewtopic.php?p=562615#p562615 first.

felipeaom wrote:The lack of the 360% is killing me D:

Don't worry, it's killing everyone else, too.

What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?

Re: What is the worst curio?