Game Development: Prelude

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
User avatar
boreial
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:02 am
Location: Smack dab in the middle of NoWhere

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by boreial »

Throwing my 2 cents in though I haven't read the entirety of replies. For a PAy game, thinks about making it pure pay to play, either a $5.00 a month fee with an annual of $50.00 or somewhere in that range, and a set number of active/living toons per account, say 5. This opinion will NOT be popular with those that want FREE. But I wonder how many of the Free playing players, are the ones always gripeing about this change or that change or why they can't do this or that.
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by sabinati »

Burzan wrote:
sabinati wrote:
because i've found a lot of it
This conversation isn't about you.
it's objectively common; sorry you're bad at finding it, or gave up after looking for an hour, or whatever
User avatar
Jalpha
Under curfew
Posts: 1841
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:16 pm

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by Jalpha »

RIP YOLO
Laying flat.
Ethan
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:14 am

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by Ethan »

I think first level ores are fine. I played the first month or so of this world as a hermit and had no trouble finding ore.
Gold and Silver seem to be very common on level 5, not sure if that is a bad thing or not.
Burzan
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:42 am

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by Burzan »

sabinati wrote:
it's objectively common; sorry you're bad at finding it, or gave up after looking for an hour, or whatever
Holy fuck we've already been over this you retard. But let me clarify: I'm not talking about me and I'm not talking about you.

If it's objectively common, then why do so many people quit before even smelting one bar? People get frustrated, they give up because of this.
Take a look around the world, the evidence is all around you.
Why shouldn't it be more common? I believe if it's more common, the game would retain more players, I want to know why you think it's fine the way it is.
User avatar
shubla
Posts: 13041
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:26 am
Location: Finland

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by shubla »

Awesome.
Image
I'm not sure that I have a strong argument against sketch colors - Jorb, November 2019
http://i.imgur.com/CRrirds.png?1
Join the moderated unofficial discord for the game! https://discord.gg/2TAbGj2
Purus Pasta, The Best Client
User avatar
IngloriouslyBad
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:21 am

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by IngloriouslyBad »

Burzan wrote:
sabinati wrote: I believe if it's more common, the game would retain more players.
I agree, it took me 3 weeks as a naked player to find 1 malachite. Kind of disheartening...
User avatar
MAMA
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:30 pm

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by MAMA »

Burzan wrote:
sabinati wrote:
it's objectively common; sorry you're bad at finding it, or gave up after looking for an hour, or whatever
Holy fuck we've already been over this you retard. But let me clarify: I'm not talking about me and I'm not talking about you.

If it's objectively common, then why do so many people quit before even smelting one bar? People get frustrated, they give up because of this.
Take a look around the world, the evidence is all around you.
Why shouldn't it be more common? I believe if it's more common, the game would retain more players, I want to know why you think it's fine the way it is.
I want to tell you that troubles with rastrut and the technology of search of ore right at the beginning isn't really clear to the beginner. From here that also went that people who don't read forums and I can't ask acquaintances left game without having melted bars.

Faced it, then having understood as everything works and as it is correct to look for, without problems started digging out mountains of different ore.

It is a hardcore and at once it is visible, the person in the world will get accustomed or not.
User avatar
jorb
Posts: 18715
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by jorb »

MAMA wrote:You that really think, what in the project will invest money when each 6 months are here such news?
This is certainly a valid concern, and the reason why we have waited with changing the payment model for as long as we have. We definitely want to avoid flux, and we certainly would like there to be a stable model that doesn't need to be changed, but finding that model is a process of discovery. To never change the model just because it was the first one we implemented it is to lock ourselves into a bad mechanic and incentive structure, and that seems unnecessary when we ourselves don't like it any more.

Our aim is to make the game more accessible, and the monetization less oppressive. We want the game to give more, not less, than it currently does.

Again, when we do get to rolling a new map we will try our best to ensure that players who already have paid don't feel run over.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."

-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
User avatar
Jalpha
Under curfew
Posts: 1841
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:16 pm

Re: Game Development: Prelude

Post by Jalpha »

On a mildly more constructive note;

If you are going to emulate the payment structure of Wurm Online, and now also put in a cap on stats like they have, at least place more emphasis on logarithmic stat gain to give grinders the impression of ongoing progress. Something to be particularly valuable for crafting if not combat. A stat cap which is easily reachable seems kind of... flat to me.

Also stat cap is way too low.
Laying flat.

Return to “Announcements”