Then maybe the permission system should be a little finer in granularity, because in case I allow someone to travel over my land that someone should still be a criminal in case he decides to attack me or others - which is a worse act compared to stealing or breaking stuff...
So 'Castle Doctrine' should be a separate permission.
Oh, and does that apply to villages with white group trespass enabled too?
-
Granger
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm
Re: Friend attacked me without Rage
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020
-
scrabe
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:09 am
Re: Friend attacked me without Rage
Granger wrote:Oh, and does that apply to villages with white group trespass enabled too?
Yea, that was bad.jorb wrote:Castle Doctrine now only applies to active Personal Claims.
I agree that it should be set on Theft at least or even Vandalism since not every sprucecap wants to build a village but might have some friendly people around.
General update of permission system would be good as well since I see some players are confused over Pclaim/Vclaim differences.
-
Ysh
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Friend attacked me without Rage
Given that even the wiki for personal claim is saying ''white permissions apply to anyone, not just the characters that are set to white in your kin list,'' clearly these become some obscure mechanics. I think a revisit is good idea.
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.