Invite to Hearth Fire

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
User avatar
Winterbrass
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:12 pm

Re:

Post by Winterbrass »

Jackard wrote:
Winterbrass wrote:requiring people to not play in a masturbatory fashion. If you want to play alone, be a hermit. ... But getting together a bunch of alts (or even just two characters together) to play with yourself is just sad.
........what

Image
Yeah, I figured that you would be one of the ones to have difficulty with that. I expect sabinati, Chakravanti, and a couple of other people to have problems with the concept, as well, so let me explain.

Playing by oneself is different from playing with oneself in this context. A person who is playing as a hermit is only interacting with things that he has done himself, on that character. From a more strict view of achievement, that specific character has accomplished and gained everything they have. The player is playing alone - by himself.

When a player brings an alt into the equation, then the level of achievement becomes less character-focused and more player-focused. It no longer becomes what that specific character can do, but what that specific player can do - the player is now playing with his characters with his other characters. Playing with himself.

The double-entendre is both illustrative and relevant.
jorb wrote:Haven aims to be hardcore.
User avatar
Jackard
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Post by Jackard »

Winterbrass wrote:Playing by oneself is different from playing with oneself in this context
no it is not

you just have a mental block. see a doctor
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: Re:

Post by sabinati »

Winterbrass wrote:
Jackard wrote:
Winterbrass wrote:requiring people to not play in a masturbatory fashion. If you want to play alone, be a hermit. ... But getting together a bunch of alts (or even just two characters together) to play with yourself is just sad.
........what

Image
Yeah, I figured that you would be one of the ones to have difficulty with that. I expect sabinati, Chakravanti, and a couple of other people to have problems with the concept, as well, so let me explain.

Playing by oneself is different from playing with oneself in this context. A person who is playing as a hermit is only interacting with things that he has done himself, on that character. From a more strict view of achievement, that specific character has accomplished and gained everything they have. The player is playing alone - by himself.

When a player brings an alt into the equation, then the level of achievement becomes less character-focused and more player-focused. It no longer becomes what that specific character can do, but what that specific player can do - the player is now playing with his characters with his other characters. Playing with himself.

The double-entendre is both illustrative and relevant.
wtf why are you talking about me, i live in a village and play with a large group
User avatar
theTrav
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: Invite to Hearth Fire

Post by theTrav »

any separation you want to make between playing one character and playing multiples is entirely in your own head and is not an objective truth

Return to “Critique & Ideas”