-
Zeler
- Posts: 1484
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:09 pm
Re: Low tier rings
The point is - in my oppinion - jewelery slots, and to be precise rings, should be reserved for "rare" stuff. I think it is a lot more rewarding to finally fill up a empty slot than upgrade already existing item.
-
Hasta
- Posts: 2250
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:27 pm
Re: Low tier rings
Can't argue with that; but then again, we do have at least several upgrade tiers for most of item slots, even with the current scarce selection of gear. I understand that "having rings" is basically a binary since legacy times, when you are either developed enough to have rings or not. That is the paradigm I was talking about shifting, and I see your arguments now.Zeler wrote:it is a lot more rewarding to finally fill up a empty slot than upgrade already existing item.
@Ysh and Burinn: regarding the value, yes, valid point; but in that sense it's a good thing for game. Makes characters' developement curve more smooth.
-
tyrtix
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:54 am
- Location: Leghorn
Re: Low tier rings
from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game ![¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif "Trollface")
-
Ysh
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Low tier rings
Just to clarify my position, I do not say this is bad. I just say that it is not without drawback for some player.tyrtix wrote:from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
-
tyrtix
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:54 am
- Location: Leghorn
Re: Low tier rings
Ysh wrote:Just to clarify my position, I do not say this is bad. I just say that it is not without drawback for some player.tyrtix wrote:from some comments, it seems that proposing something that MAY have an effect on older players is bad, because they MAY loose something... well, this speaks for itself and for many problems of this game
And that's good. In fact, for noobs that do not understand how much good could be having even a low ql, higher tier ring, this kind of change could also lead to an increase in demand for those high tiered...it's hard to really find if a change like that could be or not a drawback.
-
GenghisKhan44
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 4:56 pm
Re: Low tier rings
Why not oak rings? Probably just for show. Or as a gilding.
"...the dungeon and shackles are already at my threshold to show me here and now my eternal disgrace. Only you can work the miracle to make life possible for a soul so imperiled by doubt, O Atoner for all, exalted beyond saying." - St. Gregory of Narek, Book of Lamentations, Prayer 1.
You are much loved! Love in return!
You are much loved! Love in return!
-
jorb
- Posts: 18715
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
- Location: Here, there and everywhere.
Re: Low tier rings
Simple jewelry would be nice.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
