Vote on your favorite candidate here! strawpoll

[insanechef]

I find it super weird that america seems to be against globalism. i'm glad im not deciding which bear trap to step into nonetheless.

[jordancoles]

id bang his daughter tbh

I'd put my penis in her vagina if you know what I mean

USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST

[Teleskop]

i was working on fiverr making graphics for some pollitical site and i think trump is cool

[MagicManICT]

Voting either one is a vote for Wall Street. Voting for Turnip err... Trump... err Drumpf (or whatever the hell it is) is a vote for 1920s social orders. At the bottom you have the peons... err people that are "not white", next up you have the "poor white", then "merchant class" and finally you have the rich controlling 99% of the world's wealth (not just the 90% that it is now.)

Don't get me wrong. Make good money with stocks and such, but really, when does greed go too far? If I though my vote wouldn't count at all in my state, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse, but as there's a chance I can decide on the winner, I won't be voting Trump. Great entertainer, money-earning business man (even if half of it is cons and quasi-legal), but not a political leader.

Only hope, I think, would be congress*, but that is so broken, I'm ready to just see another Civil War and return to 1790, maybe even 1790 BC if necessary.

*One could say the Supreme Court, but you can't get congress to approve a nominee because they think there's some special rule.

I'm going to not go into my true tirade. I'm already on FBI watch lists.

[azrid]

Clinton before falling too ill to be president will sell America to Chyna and Saudi Arabia.
Trump will MAGA.

[MagicManICT]

Trump will sell it to Russia when his latest business venture goes bankrupt and he defaults on his loans to Putin.

[overtyped]

Trump will sell it to Russia when his latest business venture goes bankrupt and he defaults on his loans to Putin.

With all the crazy, retarded things trump says, at least with him, there is the slightest chance that something will improve under him. With shillery there isnt the slightest hope of that, because shill isn't even a candidate, shill a corporate shill, who's only goal is satisfying her donors and wall street.

[Onep]

Voting either one is a vote for Wall Street. Voting for Turnip err... Trump... err Drumpf (or whatever the hell it is) is a vote for 1920s social orders. At the bottom you have the peons... err people that are "not white", next up you have the "poor white", then "merchant class" and finally you have the rich controlling 99% of the world's wealth (not just the 90% that it is now.)

Don't get me wrong. Make good money with stocks and such, but really, when does greed go too far? If I though my vote wouldn't count at all in my state, I'd vote for Mickey Mouse, but as there's a chance I can decide on the winner, I won't be voting Trump. Great entertainer, money-earning business man (even if half of it is cons and quasi-legal), but not a political leader.

Only hope, I think, would be congress*, but that is so broken, I'm ready to just see another Civil War and return to 1790, maybe even 1790 BC if necessary.

*One could say the Supreme Court, but you can't get congress to approve a nominee because they think there's some special rule.

I'm going to not go into my true tirade. I'm already on FBI watch lists.

)[/hide]
So what, is Trump going to suddenly whip out Jim Crow Laws or something? Can you explain to me why brown people are suddenly inferior to white people?

[MagicManICT]

So what, is Trump going to suddenly whip out Jim Crow Laws or something? Can you explain to me why brown people are suddenly inferior to white people?

When is this "great period" Trump refers to that we don't have now? 1980s Reagan era economic policy? If memory serves me right, we were on the "brink of nuclear war" with the Soviet Union. Economic policy fed a military industrial complex that generated a lot of jobs, but was bankrupting the country. (Thank the gods the cold war ended when it did.) Add on top of that slashing a tax policy that at least had the richest in the country paying their fair share.

Or was it during the 1960s? Vietnam, civil rights movement (and the given unrest).

1950s? More civil unrest, though a lot of prosperity and establishment of the modern middle class, which was built on the trade successes of Truman, Roosevelt, and Eisenhower. Taxes were steep on those that earned in the top 10%.

1930s and 40s were marked by a World War and severe economic uncertainty due to very lax economic regulation that hasn't been seen since except in the housing market that blew up nearly a decade ago now.

This leaves the 1920s which was the last decade of the robber barons and economic elite dictated everything. There was a clear social order that nobody violated.

It certainly wasn't the 90s as that was dominated by the Clinton and the Dems, though Trump was sure friendly with Clinton back then.

Trump is blowing so much smoke up everyone's ass, and none of you folks realize it. All he's done is spout the most popular rhetoric off Twitter, ideas that will never (well, probably should never) make it through Congress. At least you know what you're getting with Clinton.

Funny thing about history repeating itself... just look up the 96 election between Clinton, Dole, and Perot. First election where the elected president didn't get 50% of the popular vote. Dole probably would have beaten Clinton, but Mr. Perot just wasn't happy with what the GOP was doing, and just had to run on his form of economic conservatism and crashed the election.

Also note that the Libertarian party has been gaining ground the last 20 years. So far they haven't achieved much more than 5% of the popular vote in any presidential election (2008 if I recall right). Johnson is pushing to get in the debates, and is likely to pull down at least 10% of the vote, most of which will be dissatisfied Republicans that would have voted for Kasich, Cruz, Bush, or any other GOP candidate, but won't vote for Trump.

I still can't decide who I'm voting for, but it ain't for the blowhard that's looking at criminal fraud charges.

[overtyped]

Mr. Perot just wasn't happy with what the GOP was doing, and just had to run on his form of economic conservatism and crashed the election.

Grrr, makes bob dole mad when he thinks of the election he would have won. How dare that traitor cost bob dole the presidency. Bob Dole was clearly the most qualified.