-
ChildhoodObesity
- Posts: 4165
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:16 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
ehh idk about that 1 rlly sorry bros, also why is every1 acting like sieging is so broken its rlly not that bad, better than it ever was in legacy if they fixed the whole multiple shield bullshit itd be fine 16 hours isnt as bad as 24 lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZIg3c ... e=youtu.be <----- (me) (hatguy) (PART2)
-
Ozzy123
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
16 hours of camping =/= 24 hours of being able to go away from your pcChildhoodObesity wrote:ehh idk about that 1 rlly sorry bros, also why is every1 acting like sieging is so broken its rlly not that bad, better than it ever was in legacy if they fixed the whole multiple shield bullshit itd be fine 16 hours isnt as bad as 24 lol
also
thats why people complain about it xdif they fixed the whole multiple shield bullshit itd be fine
epicbuds wrote:just got this game a bad review on my website and will post on every forum and game page i can think of to tell people to stay away from this site this game is a joke
viruseg wrote:Kill all new players for no reason. Polish scum came running and killed me with a crowd. Suck fuck fucks..
-
ChildhoodObesity
- Posts: 4165
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:16 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
ya but can u tell me a time where u ever placed a ram at an ACTIVE village and came back 24 hours later 2 raid it anyone who did ramchecks saw them and i can only recall raiding nab villages or inactives with itOzzy123 wrote:16 hours of camping =/= 24 hours of being able to go away from your pcChildhoodObesity wrote:ehh idk about that 1 rlly sorry bros, also why is every1 acting like sieging is so broken its rlly not that bad, better than it ever was in legacy if they fixed the whole multiple shield bullshit itd be fine 16 hours isnt as bad as 24 lol
alsothats why people complain about it xdif they fixed the whole multiple shield bullshit itd be fine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZIg3c ... e=youtu.be <----- (me) (hatguy) (PART2)
-
Atamzsiktrop
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:32 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
TBH all big factions are scumbags and idk why some people seem surprised about it
lol idk if ur joking but LadyGoo is actually helping the community stay alive and all u guys do is killing noobs so i think ur wrong bro xd i prefer 2 trust her than u TBHdafels wrote: Anyways, let me be clear for some, anyone who is believing every LadyGoo's word is a dumb shitter and they are no better than us in sense of killing and raiding.
-
dafels
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:49 pm
- Yahoo Messenger: davis
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
nah bro you're wrong, all she wants to do is to kill and raid all the noobs in the world like she did back in the good old days - world 5, world 6 and world 7
its fine xD
its fine xD
Click to read Developer's thoughts on PvP
-
Atamzsiktrop
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:32 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
the time she kills a noob ill become a king of africa, and i've never even been to africa
blame her fighters not Freya
blame her fighters not Freya
-
Jeff
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:14 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
Raiding has to be purposefully hard, though.
It takes several weeks, if not months, to build and run an active community. And yet less than an hour is enough to destroy it, once you have access, as it happened to us.
Ideally, it shouldn't be possible to deceive people like it was done in this case. In real life you can't just make an alt char, after all. Unfortunately the game has no way to prevent people doing so, and thus there is no way to trust people, making any social interaction a gamble. And sometimes, like in this case, they just end up being fatal. Sad, but that's just how it is.
It takes several weeks, if not months, to build and run an active community. And yet less than an hour is enough to destroy it, once you have access, as it happened to us.
Ideally, it shouldn't be possible to deceive people like it was done in this case. In real life you can't just make an alt char, after all. Unfortunately the game has no way to prevent people doing so, and thus there is no way to trust people, making any social interaction a gamble. And sometimes, like in this case, they just end up being fatal. Sad, but that's just how it is.
"I'm just an humble farmer, after all"
-
Kaios
- Posts: 9268
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
I think one of the main issues here is that none of these players think that way and there's very few players left that do. Just look at their complaints in this thread alone:Jeff wrote:Raiding has to be purposefully hard, though.
It takes several weeks, if not months, to build and run an active community. And yet less than an hour is enough to destroy it, once you have access, as it happened to us.
1. Sieging takes too long (yet it takes less time than it did in Legacy in total).
2. Some bullshit about multiple shields but there's only one village I'm aware of that has multiple shield protection in the form of several villages.
3. Alt vaulting (except you don't even need alts if you simply have a charter to another place instead).
4. And #4 the hidden complaint, I can't siege anyone through legitimate means because that will give a chance for fighters to come get me.
-
Atamzsiktrop
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:32 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
I'm more than sure most fighters seek fights rather than try to avoid them.Kaios wrote: 4. And #4 the hidden complaint, I can't siege anyone through legitimate means because that will give a chance for fighters to come get me.
-
Kaios
- Posts: 9268
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am
Re: The end of Aramore. Pokemons got tricked!
sure but unless the intent is to attempt sieging of a place for the sole purpose of luring defenders than that's not seeking a fight, that's called a gank and most people avoid those.Atamzsiktrop wrote:I'm more than sure most fighters seek fights rather than try to avoid them.