Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
User avatar
LadyGoo
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:06 am

Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by LadyGoo »

The new lands seem to fit perfectly boats and knarrs, but people traveling by wagons and mounted, or even by feet.

The rivers are way too big in most of the cases to build a crossroads bridging 2 shores. Consequently, people travelling on land end up travelling 5 minimaps on land, then crossing the river on a raft. There are no land masses good for wagon travels with no interruptions. We enjoyed a lot traveling on a wagon in Legacy along the supergrid junctions (they used to be seamless without any water systems).

IMHO, the map generation should be more balanced:
- The majority of the rivers should not be way too wide to build crossroads and milestones. Noobs won't be able to connect to the market areas or communicate/hunt efficiently.
- There should be a good balance between river-based travel and land-based one. As in allow us to have many rivers, lakes, but there should be enough shallow water crossings or variability in river widths.
- Some rules like: the rivers could be thinner towards the north or in relationship to the land levels. Something that would let the players to investigate where they could cross the rivers and etc. That way custom clients with flatworld won't be that popular and people will actually pay attention to level differences.

P.S. We were trying to find some mountains looking at the land level differences. But in most cases the level difference for the mountain area shows up only within 1 minimap distance to the mountain terrain. Imho, it would be nice if the level difference would start way earlier.
Hafen Helpdesk Skype Conference [Eng]: https://join.skype.com/mxo3yVNbrCK9
Справочная Конференция [Ru]: https://join.skype.com/fnAcsc0srDBN

Trade Conference [Eng-Ru]: https://join.skype.com/gNT6Rs92PTtM

W10 Queen of Dis fiancée of Leanne69 (Lolo)
W9 Hive [Ruler]
W8 Dis [Chieftain]
W7 Ofir [Lawspeaker]
W6 Dis [Chieftain] & Disneyland
W5 Vitterstad [Lawspeaker]
W4 A.D. [Fighter]
W3 Garden of Metallurgists [LS]
User avatar
MrPunchers
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:54 am
Location: Where do you think?

Re: Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by MrPunchers »

Maybe we should be able to ford or float Wagons across rivers?
Suck me good and hard thru my jorts
User avatar
Jacobian123
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 4:41 am
Location: The Inn of Brodgar

Re: Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by Jacobian123 »

less rivers more roads yes

rivers should be long and good for fast travel but shouldn't lead to every single spot on the map
W3-W8 - Hermit
W9 - (Ex)-Leader of Vidarrheim

Image Image Image
User avatar
peanutzrgud
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:18 am

Re: Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by peanutzrgud »

I think we have already ruled out bridges right?
User avatar
jorb
Posts: 18715
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:07 am
Location: Here, there and everywhere.

Re: Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by jorb »

I agree, and have already made similar notes for the future.
"The psychological trials of dwellers in the last times will be equal to the physical trials of the martyrs. In order to face these trials we must be living in a different world."

-- Hieromonk Seraphim Rose
User avatar
vatas
Posts: 5255
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:34 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Re: Terrain critique: Map Expansion

Post by vatas »

Current mapgen would be fine if fords (section of river that is entirely shallow water so It can be walked, ridden or wagoneered over without hassle) were much more common.
Haven and Hearth Wiki (Maintained by volunteers - test/verify when practical. Forum thread

Basic Claim Safety (And what you’re doing wrong
TL:;DR: Build a Palisade with only Visitor gates.)

Combat Guide (Overview, PVE, PVP) (Includes how to escape/minimize risk of getting killed.)

Return to “Critique & Ideas”